V
van
Asseldonk, M.A.P.M., Huirne, R.B.M & Dijkhuizen, A.A. (1998). Quantifying
characteristics of information-technology applications based on expert
knowledge for detection of oestrus and mastitis in dairy cows. Preventive
Veterinary Medicine, 36 (4), 273-286.
van der Haar, J.W., Kemp, R.G.M &
Omta, O. (2001). Creating value that cannot be copied. Industrial
Marketing Management, 30 (8), 627-636.
van
der Lans, I.A. & Heiser, W.J. (1992). Constrained
Part-worth estimation in conjoint analysis using the self-explicated utility
model. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 9, 325-344.
van
der Lans, I.A., Wittink, D.R., Huber, J. & Vriens, M. (1992). Within-
and across-attribute constraints in ACA and full profile conjoint analysis. In
M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1992 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp.
365-379). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.
Van
der Pol, M. & Cairns, J. (1998). Establishing patient’s
preferences for blood transfusion support: An application of conjoint analysis.
Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 3, 70-77.
van
der Pol, M. & Cairns, J. (2001). Estimating time preferences
for health using discrete choice experiments. Social Science & Medicine,
52 (9), 1459-1470.
van
der Pool, M. & Ryan, M. (1996). Using conjoint analysis to
establish consumer preferences for fruit and vegetables. British Food
Journal, 98 (8), 5-12.
van Limburg, B. (1998). City
marketing: a multi-attribute approach. Tourism Management, 19 (5),
475-477.
van Schaik, G., Dijkhuizen, A.A.,
Huirne, R.B.M. & Benedictus, G. (1998). Adaptive conjoint analysis to
determine perceived risk factors of farmers, veterinarians and AI technicians
for introduction of BHVl to dairy farms. Preventive
Veterinary Medicine, 37 (1-4), 101-112.
van
Schijndel, C. (1992). How to communicate complex
techniques in a multi-cultural environment. Marketing Opportunities with
Advanced Research Techniques: Proceedings of the second SKIM Seminar (pp.
51-58). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: SKIM Market and Policy Research.
Vandenbosch,
M.B. & Weinberg, C.B. (1997). A value analysis model for
farm equipment manufacturers. Agribusiness, 13 (4), 409-421.
VanDeVyvere, Y., Oppewal, H. &
Timmermans, H. (1998). The validity of hierarchical
information integration choice experiments to model residential preference and
choice. Geographical analysis: An international journal of theoretical
geography, 30 (3), 254-272.
Vavra, T.G., Green, P.E. &
Krieger, A.M. (1999). Evaluating EZPass. Using conjoint analysis to assess
consumer response to a new tollway technology. Marketing Research,
Summer, 4-13+16.
Verhallen,
T. & DeNooij, G.J. (1982). Retail attributes and shopping
patronage. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2, 439-455.
Verma, R. & Pullman, M.E. (1998).
An analysis of the supplier selection process. Omega-International
Journal of Management Science, 26 (6), 739-750.
Verma,
V.K. & Zellner, A. (1991). A bayesian econometric methodology
for estimation and prediction in conjoint analysis. In T.K. Kaul & J.K.
Sengupta (Eds.), Economic models, estimation, and socioeconomic systems:
Essays in honor of Karl A. Fox (pp. 369-397). Amsterdam, Holland:
North-Holland.
Vick, S. & Scott, A. (1998). Agency
in health care. Examining patients´ preferences for attributes of the
doctor-patient relationship. Journal of Health Economics, 17 (5), 587-605.
Vickers, Z.M. (1993).
Incorporating tasting into a conjoint analysis of taste, health claim, price
and brand for purchasing strawberry yogurt. Journal of Sensory Studies, 8,
341-352.
Vidulich,
M.A. & Tsang, P.S. (1986). Techniques of subjective workload
assessment: A comparison of SWAT and the NASA-Bipolar methods. Special Issue:
Aviation psychology. Ergonomics, 29, 1385-1398.
Viscusi, W.K., Magat, W.A. &
Huber, J. (1991). Pricing environmental health risks: Survey assessment of
risk-risk and risk-dollar trade-offs for chronic bronchitis. Journal of
Environmental Economics and Management, 21, 32-51.
Viswanathan, M. & Narayanan,
S. (1992). Processing numerical versus verbal attribute information: A Study
using information acquisition patterns. Marketing Letters, 3 (2),
201-208.
Voeth,
M. & Hahn, C. (1998). Limit Conjoint-Analyse. Marketing
ZFP, 20, 119-132.
Voeth, M. (1999). 25 Jahre conjointanalytische
Forschung in Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft –
Ergänzungsheft, 2, 153-176.
Voeth,
M. (2000). Nutzenmessung in der Kaufverhaltensforschung: Die hierarchische
individualisierte Limit-Conjoint-Analyse (HILCA). Wiesbaden: Gabler.
Vriens, M. & Maas, A. (1990). Conjoint
analysis of trade-off preference matrices: Some possible extensions. In S.E.G.
Lea, P. Webley, & B.M. Young (Eds.), Applied economic psychology in the
1990's (pp. 1075-1081). Springer, Berlin.
Vriens,
M. (1992). Strengths and weaknesses of various conjoint analysis
techniques and suggestions for improvement. In Marketing Opportunities with
Advanced Research Techniques: Proceedings of the second SKIM Seminar (pp.
11-26). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: SKIM Market and Policy Research.
Vriens, M. (1994). Solving
marketing problems with conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing Management, 10
(1-3), 37-55.
Vriens, M. (1995). Conjoint analysis in marketing. Developments in stimulus representation and segmentation methods. Groningen: SOM.
Vriens,
M., Loosschilder, G.H., Rosbergen, E. & Wittink, D.R. (1998). Verbal
versus realistic pictorial representations in conjoint analysis with design
attributes. Journal of Product Innovation and Management, 15 (5),
455-467.
Vriens,
M., Oppewal, H. & Wedel, M. (1998). Ratings-based
versus choice-based latent class conjoint models. Journal of Market Research
Society, 40 (3), 237-248.
Vriens, M., Scheer, H.R. van,
Hoekstra, J.C. & Bult, J.R. (1998). Conjoint experiments for direct mail
response optimization. European Journal of Marketing, 32 (3/4), 323-339.
Vriens,
M., Wedel, M. & Wilms, T. (1996). Metric conjoint
segmentation methods: A monte carlo comparison. Journal of Marketing
Research, 33 (1), 73-85.
vvan
der Lans, I.A. & Heiser, W.J. (1991). Constrained
part-worth estimation in conjoint analysis using the self-explicated utility
model (Research Report RR 90-02). Department of Data
Theory, University of Leiden, The Netherlands.