T

Tacke, G. & Pohl, A. (1997). Der Kunde zahlt nicht jeden Preis. Bank Magazin, 8, 32-34.

Tacke, G. (1989). Nichtlineare Preisbildung: Höhere Gewinne durch Differenzierung. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

Talaga, J.A. & Buch, J. (1998). Consumer tradeoffs among mortgage instrument variables. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 16 (6), 264-270.

Tantiwong, D. & Wilton, P.C. (1985). Understanding food store preferences among the elderly using hybrid conjoint measurement models. Journal of Retailing, 61 (4), 35-64.

Tarasewich, P. & Nair, S.K. (2001). Designer-moderated product design. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48 (2), 175-188.

Tashchian, A., Tashchian, R. & Slama, M. (1981). The impact of individual differences on the validity of conjoint analysis. In Advances in consumer research (No. 9, pp. 363-366). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

Tashchian, A., Tashchian, R. & Slama, M. (1983). The family life cycle and preferred policies for gasoline conservation: a conjoint analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45 (3), 689-697.

Tatham, R. (1991a). Discussion comments on simulating market choice in conjoint analysis. In W.D. Neal (Ed.), First Annual Advanced Research Techniques Forum, June 24-27, 1990, Beaver Creek, Colorado (p. 55). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.

Tatham, R. (1991b). Discussion comments on attribute level effects in conjoint results: The problem and possible solutions. In W.D. Neal (Ed.), First Annual Advanced Research Techniques Forum, June 24-27, 1990, Beaver Creek, Colorado (pp. 43-54). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.

Teas, R.K. & Dellva, W.L. (1985). Conjoint measurement of consumers’ preferences for multiattribute financial services. Journal of Bank Research, 16 (2), 99-112.

Teas, R.K. & Perr, A.L. (1989). A test of a decompositional method of multiattribute perceptions measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 384-391.

Teas, R.K. (1985). An analysis of the temporal stability and structural reliability of metric conjoint analysis procedures. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 13, 122-142.

Teas, R.K. (1987). Magnitude scaling of the dependent variable in decompositional multiattribute preference models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 15, 64-73.

Teichert, T. (1994). Zur Validität der in Conjoint-Analysen ermittelten Nutzenwerte. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 7 (8), 610-629.

Teichert, T. (1998). Schätzgenauigkeit von Conjoint-Analysen. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 68 (11), 1245-1266.

Teichert, T. (1999). Conjoint-Analyse. In A. Herrmann & C. Homburg (Hrsg.), Marktforschung. Methoden, Anwendungen, Praxisbeispiele (S. 473-511). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

Teichert, T. (2001). Nutzenschätzung in Conjoint-Analysen. Theoretische Fundierung und empirische Aussagekraft. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.

Teisl, M.F., Boyle, K.J. & Roe, B. (1996). Conjoint analysis of angler evaluations of atlantic salmon restoration on the Penobscot River, Maine. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 16, 861-871.

Thaden, C. von (2002). Conjoint-Analyse mit vielen Merkmalen: Monte-Carlo-Untersuchung einer gebrückten Conjoint-Analyse. Frankfurt a.M.: Lang.

Tharp, M. & Marks, L. (1990). An examination of the effects of attribute order and product order biases in conjoint analysis. In Advances in consumer research (No. 17, pp. 563-570). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

Theuerkauf, I. (1989). Kundennutzenmessung mit Conjoint. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 59 (11), 1179-1192.

Thomas, L. (1979). Conjoint Measurement als Instrument der Absatzforschung. Marketing. Zeitschrift für Forschung und Praxis, 1, 199-211.

Thomas, L. (1983). Der Einfluß von Kindern auf die Produktpräferenzen ihrer Mütter. Berlin: Duncker-Humblot.

Thomas, U. & Dröll, C. (1989). Der Einfluß von Informationen auf die Präferenzstruktur von Verbrauchern. Marketing ZFP, 11, 239-248.

Timmermans, H. (1987). Hybrid and non-hybrid evaluation models for predicting outdoor recreation behavior: A test of predictive ability. Leisure Sciences, 9 (2), 67-76.

Timmermans, H.J.P. (1982). Consumer choice of shopping centre: An information integration approach. Regional Studies, 16, 171-182.

Timmermans, H.J.P., Borgers, A., van Dijk, J. & Oppewal, H. (1992). Residential choice behavior of dual earner households: A decompositional joint choice model. Environment and Planning A, 24, 517-533.

Timmermans, H.J.P., van der Heijden, R.E.C.M. & Westerveld, H. (1984). Decision-making between multiattribute choice alternatives: A model of spatial shopping behaviour using conjoint measurements. Environment and Planning A, 16, 377-387.

Toombs, K. & Bailey, G. (1995). How to redesign your organization to match customer needs. Planning Review (A Publication of the Planning Forum), 23 (2), 20-25.

Townend, M. & Shackley, P. (2002). Establishing and quantifying the preferences of mental health service users for day hospital care: Pilot study using conjoint analysis. Journal of Mental Health, 11 (1), 85-96.

Toy, D., Rager, R. & Guadagnolo, F. (1989). Strategic marketing for recreational facilities: A hybrid conjoint analysis approach. Journal of Leisure Research, 21 (4), 276-296.

Trögel, T. & Rothsprach, M. (1996). Die Conjoint-Analyse als dekompositionelles Verfahren zur Nutzenmessung und Präferenzanalyse. In Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaus (Bd. 32, S. 527-537).

Trommsdorff, V. & Weber, G. (1994). Innovation braucht Marktforschung - Marktforschung braucht Innovation. Thexis, 11, 56-70.

Troutman, C.M. & Shanteau, J.C. (1976). Do consumers evaluate products by adding and averaging attribute information? Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 101-106.

Tsalikis, J., Seaton, B. & Shepherd, P.L. (2001). Relativism in ethical resarch: A proposed model and mode of inquiry. Journal of Business Ethics, 32 (3), 231-246.

Tsalikis, J., Seaton, B. & Tomaras, P (2002). A new perspective on cross-cultural ethical evaluations: The use of conjoint analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 35 (4), 281-292.

Tscheulin, D.K. & Blaimont, C. (1993). Die Abhängigkeit der Prognosegüte von Conjoint-Studien von demographischen Probanden-Charakteristika. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 63 (8), 839-847.

Tscheulin, D.K. & Helmig, B. (1998). The optimal design of hospital advertising by means of conjoint measurement. Journal of Advertising Research, 38 (3), 35-46.

Tscheulin, D.K. (1991). Ein empirischer Vergleich der Eignung von Conjoint-Analyse und "Analytic Hierarchy Process" (AHP) zur Neuproduktplanung. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 61 (11), 1267-1280.

Tscheulin, D.K. (1992). Optimale Produktgestaltung: Erfolgsprognose mit Analytic Hierarchy Process und Conjoint-Analyse. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

Tscheulin, D.K. (1996). Determinanten der Validität der Conjoint-Analyse. In A. von Ahsen & T. Czenskowsky (Hrsg.), Marketing und Marktforschung: Entwicklungen, Erweiterungen und Schnittstellen im nationalen und internationalen Kontext (S. 585-598). Hamburg: Lit.

Tucci, L.A. & Talaga, J. (1997). Service guarantees and consumers´ evaluation of services. Journal of Services Marketing, 11 (1), 10-18.

Tukey, J.W. (1949). One degree of freedom for additivity. Biometrics, 5, 232-242.

Tullous, R. & Munson, J.M. (1992). Organizational purchasing analysis for sales management. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 12 (2), 15-26.

Tumbusch, J.J. (1987). How to design a conjoint study. In Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference on Perceptual Mapping, Conjoint Analysis, and Computer Interviewing (No. 1, pp. 283-287). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Tumbusch, J.T. (1991). Validation of adaptive conjoint analysis (ACA) versus standard concept testing. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1991 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 177-184). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Tversky, A. (1967a). A general theory of polynomial conjoint measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 4, 1-20.

Tversky, A. (1967b). Utility theory and additivity analysis of risky choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 27-36.

Tyner, M.J. & Weiner, J. (1989). Optimal pricing strategies through conjoint analysis. In Sawtooth Software (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference: Gaining a competitive advantage through PC-based interviewing and analysis (Vol 1, pp. 45-51), Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

U

Ueda, T. (1994). Analysis of preferences for services based on conjoint analysis. IEICE Transactions on Communications (J77-B (9), pp. 542-549). Japan: Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers (in Japanese).

Ueda, T. (2000, July). Methods of treating data with contradiction in the conjoint analysis. Paper presented at the 5^th Conference of the Association of Asian-Pacific Operations Research Societies (APORS) in Singapore.

Ulengin, B. (1998). Using hierarchical information integration to examine customer preferences in banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 16 (5), 202-210.

Ullrich J.R. & Wilson R.E. (1990). CPCJM: A set of programs for checking polynomial conjoint measurement and additivity axioms of 3-dimensional matrices. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 433-434.

Ullrich, J.R. & Cummins, D.E. (1973). PCJM: A program for conjoint measurement analysis of polynomial composition rules. Behavioral Science, 18, 226-227.

Ullrich, J.R. & Painter, J.R. (1974). A conjoint measurement analysis of human judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12, 50-61.

Ullrich, J.R., Cummins, D.E. & Walkenbach, J. (1978). PCJM2: A program for the axiomatic conjoint measurement analysis of polynomial composition rules. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 10, 89-90.

Ulvila, J.W. & Brown, R.V. (1991). Decision analysis comes of age. In Accurate business forecasting: A Harvard business review paperback (pp. 13-24). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing Division.

Umesh, U.N. & Mishra, S. (1990). A monte carlo investigation of conjoint analysis index-of-fit: Significance and power. Psychometrica, 55 (1), 33-44.

Umesh, U.N. (1984). Validation of a consumer preference measurement procedure. In R.W. Belk, R. Peterson, G.S. Albaum, M.B. Holbrook, R.A. Kerin, N.K. Malhotra & P. Wright (Eds.), 1984 AMA Educators’ Proceedings (No. 50, pp. 398-401). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.

Umesh, U.N., Krieger, A.M. & Green, P.E. (1997). Effect of level of disaggregation on conjoint cross validations: Some comparative findings. Paper presented at the 1997 INFORMS Marketing Science Conference, Berkeley, CA.

Urban, G.L. & Hauser, J.R. (1980). Chapter 10: Product positioning – preference analysis and benefit segmentation, and Chapter 11: Logit analysis – an analytic technique to estimate purchase probabilities. In Design and marketing of new products (pp. 235-316). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Urlings, J. (1992a). Understanding conjoint analysis. Marketing opportunities with advanced research techniques: Proceedings of the second SKIM Seminar (pp. 1-10). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: SKIM Market and Policy Research.