S

Sadler, T.R. (2001). Environmental Taxation in an Optimal Tax Framework. Atlantic Economic Journal, 29 (2), 215-231.

Safizadeh, M.H. (1989). The internal validity of the trade-off method of conjoint analysis. Decision Sciences, 20, 451-461.

Salling, S.W. & Deegan, J. (1991). Using conjoint information: Organizational factors. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1991 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 163-174). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Saltzman, A. & MacElroy, W.H. (1999). Disk-based mail surveys: A longitudinal study of practices and results. Paper presented at the 7th Sawtooth Software Conference, San Diego, CA.

San Miguel, F., Ryan, M. & McIntosh, E. (1997). Methodological issues in the use of conjoint analysis in health care: An application to women’s preferences for the treatment of menorrhagia (HERU discussion paper No. 06/97). Aberdeen: University.

San Miguel, F., Ryan, M. & McIntosh, E. (2000). Applying conjoint analysis in economic evaluations: An application to menorrhagia. Applied Economics, 32 (7), 823-833.

Sanchez, M. & Gil, J.M. (1998). Consumer Preferences for wine attributes in different retail stores: A conjoint approach. International Journal of Wine Marketing, 10 (1), 25-38.

Sanchez, R. & Sudharshan, D. (1993). Real-time market research. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 11 (7), 29-38.

Sandor, Z. & Wedel, M. (1999, May). Optimal mixed logit designs for conjoint choice experiments. Paper presented at the Marketing Science Conference on Reflection and Renewal, Syracuse, University School of Management.

Sands, S. & Warwick, K. (1981). What product benefits to offer to whom: An application of conjoint segmentation. California Management Review, 24, 69-74.

Sandvik-Wiklund, P. & Wiklund, H. (1999). Student focused design and improvement of university courses. Managing Service Quality, 9 (6), 434-443.

SAS Institute, Inc. (1993).  SAS technical report R-109: Conjoint analysis examples. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

Sattler, H. & Hensel-Börner, S. (1999). A comparison of conjoint measurement with self-explicated approaches (Diskussionspapier Reihe A, Nr. 99/07). Jena: Universität, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
zugleich: Sattler, H. & Hensel-Börner, S. (2000). A comparison of conjoint measurement and self-explicated approaches. In A. Gustafsson & A. Herrmann (Hrsg.), Conjoint measurement: Methods and applications (pp. 121-134). Berlin: Springer.

Sattler, H. (1991). Herkunfts- und Gütezeichen im Kaufentscheidungsprozeß. Stuttgart: M&P.

Sattler, H. (1994). Die Validität von Produkttests. Ein empirischer Vergleich zwischen hypothetischer und realer Produktpräsentation. Marketing ZFP, 16 (1), 31-41.

Sattler, H. (1999). Ein Indikatorenmodell zur langfristigen monetären Markenwertbestimmung (Teil 1). Die Betriebswirtschaft, 59 (5), 633-653.

Sattler, H., Hensel-Börner, S. & Krüger, B. (2001). Die Abhängigkeit der Validität von Conjoint-Studien von demographischen Probandencharakteristika: Neue empirische Befunde. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 71 (7), 771-787.

Saunders, J. & Guoqun, F. (1996). Dual branding: How corporate names add value. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 14 (7), 29-34.

Sawtooth Software (1985). Adaptive conjoint analysis: User's manual. Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Sawtooth Software (1991). CVA system: Conjoint value analysis. Evanston, IL: Sawtooth Software.

Sawtooth Software (1993). ACA system: Adaptive conjoint analysis, version 4.0. Evanston, IL: Sawtooth Software.

Sawtooth Software (1993). CBC system: The CBC system for choice-based conjoint analysis. Evanston, IL: Sawtooth Software.

Sawtooth Software (Summer 1994). Consumer pulse creates mixed-media conjoint interview. In S. Weiss (Ed.), Sawtooth News (No. 10 (1), p. 6). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Sawtooth Software (Summer 1994). Different conjoint methods can produce different price information. In S. Weiss (Ed.), Sawtooth News (No. 10 (1), p. 6). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Sawtooth Software (Summer 1994). Practical improvements in perceptual mapping and conjoint analysis reported at marketing science conference. In S. Weiss (Ed.), Sawtooth News (No. 10 (1), p. 3). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Sawtooth Software (Winter 1994/1995). Discrete choice modeling merits serious investigation. In S. Weiss (Ed.), Sawtooth News (No. 10 (2), p. 4). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Schaffer, C.M. & Green, P.E. (1998). Cluster-based market segmentation: Some further comparisons of alternative approaches. Journal of the Market Research Society, 40 (2), 155-163.

Schaffer, C.M. (1990). Importance weight sensitivity in the hybrid conjoint model. In B.J. Dunlap (Ed.), Developments in marketing science. Proceedings of the thirteenth annual conference of the Academy of Marketing Science (Vol. 13, pp. 390-394). Cullowhee, NC: Academy of Marketing Science.

Schaffer, C.M. (1991). Comment on Hase. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1991 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 249-250). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Scharf, A., Schubert, B. & Volkmer, H.-P. (1996). Conjointanalyse und Multimedia. Überprüfung von Produktkonzepten für neue Nahrungs- und Genußmittel mittels multimedialer adaptiver Conjointanalyse. Planung und Analyse, 23 (6), 26-31.

Scheer, H.R. van der, Hoekstra, J.C. & Vriens, M. (1996). Using "opt out" reply cards in direct mail optimal design, target selection, and profit implications. Journal of Direct Marketing, 10 (3), 18-27.

Scheer, M., Orth, U. & Oppenheim, P. (1999). Anwendung der Conjoint-Analyse zur Vorbereitung eines internationalen Markteintritts. Agrarwirtschaft, 48 (5), 194-201.

Schellhase, R. & Franken, B. (1997). Die Conjoint-Analyse als Instrument des Marketing-Controlling. Der Markt, 36 (2), 75-83.

Schewe, G. & Dreesen, A. (1994). Die externe Rekrutierung des kaufmännischen Führungskräfte-Nachwuchses. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung. Zeitschrift für Führung + Organisation, 6, 381-387.

Schifferstein, H.N.J., Verlegh, P.W.J. & Wittink, D.R. (1998). Range and number-of-levels effects in derived and stated attribute importances. Working paper, Yale School of Management.

Schleusener, M. (2001). Ermittlung von Preisbereitschaften im Verkehrsdienstleistungsbereich – dargestellt am Beispiel der Deutschen Bahn AG. Arbeitspapier (Nr. 149), Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft für Marketing und Unternehmensführung.

Schlossberg, H. (1991). Conjoint vs. SCA: Choose your model and come out testing. Marketing News, 25 (2), 6.

Schmidhofer, M. (1996). Verbraucherpräferenzen bei Kindermilchprodukten - Ergebnisse einer Conjoint-Analyse. In Wissenschaftlicher Jahresbericht über die Tätigkeit des Forschungszentrums für Milch und Lebensmittel (Bd. 38, S. 58-61).

Schmidt, M. (1987). An empirical evaluation of some aggregation techniques and estimation algorithms in conjoint analysis. In ESOMAR Symposium on Mikro and Macro Market Modeling (pp. 135-156). ESOMAR.

Schmidt, M. (1990). Conjoint analysis: How sensitive are parameter estimates with regard to syntactical variations in the wording of attribute levels? – Empirical evidence from an experimental design study. In American Marketing Association Educators´ Proceedings (pp. 270-275). Chicago, Ill: American Marketing Association.

Schmidt-Gallas, D. (1998). Nachfrageorientierte Produktgestaltung auf Investitionsgütermärkten. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Univ.-Verlag.

Schmitz, P.M. & Wiegand, S. (1991). Die zukünftige Entwicklung der Landwirtschaft in den fünf neuen Bundesländern. Kiel: Wissenschafts-Verlag Vauk.

Schmutte, A.M. (1997). Conjoint Analyse zur simultanen Ermittlung von Patientenpräferenzen im Krankenhaus. Diskussionspapier 7/97, Universität der Bundeswehr München. Verfügbar unter: http://www.unibw-muenchen.de/campus/WOW/v1072/Personen/Schmutte/Pub/Diskpap7_97/Diskpap7_97.htm, 12.10.98.

Schneider, C. (1997). Präferenzbildung bei Qualitätsunsicherheit: Das Beispiel Wein. Berlin: Duncker & Humblodt.

Schneider, D. (1998). Produktoptimierung und zielorientierte Kostengestaltung mit Conjoint Measurement. Zeitschrift für Unternehmensentwicklung und Industrial Engineering, 47 (1), 24-27.

Schneider, W. & Kornmeier, M. (1996). Die Entscheidungsbereitschaft von Studierenden der Wirtschaftswissenschaften aus den Neuen Bundesländern. In K. Schweickart (Hrsg.), Systemtransformation in Osteuropa: Herausforderungen an Unternehmen beim Übergang von der Planwirtschaft in die Marktwirtschaft (S. 65-83). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

Schnore, H.J. & Prosperi, D.C. (1978). A conjoint measurement model of consumer spatial behavior. Regional Science Perspectives, 8, 122-134.

Schopp, M. (1995). Verbraucherpräferenz für verschiedene Trinkmilch-Verpackungssysteme. In Wissenschaftlicher Jahresbericht über die Tätigkeit des Forschungszentrums für Milch und Lebensmittel (Bd. 37, S. 55-58).

Schori, T.R. & Meadow, H.L. (1987). Conjoint analysis vs preference analysis: A comparison. Psychological Reports, 60 (3 (2)), 1063-1068.

Schrader, S. (1990). Zwischenbetrieblicher Informationstransfer: eine empirische Analyse kooperativen Verhaltens. Berlin: Duncker & Humblodt.

Schrieder, G. & Heidhues, F. (1991). Conjoint analysis and its predictive power for financial market development: A methodological framework. In C. Cuevas & M. Benoit-Cattin (Eds.), Finance and rural development in West Africa. Ouagadougou: OSU, CIRAD, CEDRES, INERA, CNCA.

Schubert, B. & Wenk, T. (1992). Vom Pauschalurteil zur Einzelanalyse. Touristik-Management, 71-74.

Schubert, B. & Wolf, A. (1993). Erlebnisorientierte Produktgestaltung. In U. Arnold & K. Eierhoff (Hrsg.), Marketingfocus: Produktmanagement (S. 121-151). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

Schubert, B. (1991). Entwicklung von Konzepten für Produktinnovationen mittels Conjointanalyse. Stuttgart: Poeschel.

Schuler, H.J. (1981). Grocery shopping choices: Individual preferences based on store attractiveness and distance. Environment and Behavior, 13 (3), 331-347.

Schwalba, M. (2000). Die wettbewerbsbezogene Abgrenzung des relevanten Marktes. Frankfurt am Main u.a.: Lang.

Schwan, I. (1996). Conjoint-Analyse im Bankensektor. Die Bank, 36 (4), 236-239.

Schweiger, G., Friederes, G. & Strebinger, A. (1995). Produktionsverlagerung bei Markenartikeln aus Sicht des Konsumenten. In D. Baier & R. Decker (Hrsg.), Marketingprobleme: innovative Lösungsansätze aus Forschung und Praxis (S. 187-196). Regensburg: Roderer.

Schweikl, H. (1985). Computergestützte Präferenzanalyse mit individuell wichtigen Produktmerkmalen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

Scott, J.E. & Wright, P. (1976). Modeling an organizational buyer`s product evaluation strategy: Validity and procedural considerations. Journal of Marketing Research, 13, 211-224.

Sebastian, K.-H. & Hilleke, K. (1991). Welche Qualität kann sich Ihr Unternehmen leisten? Absatzwirtschaft, 34 (Okt.), 180-186.

Segal, M.N. (1982). Reliability of conjoint analysis: Contrasting data collection procedures. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 139-143.

Segal, R. (1995). Forecasting the market for electric vehicles in California using conjoint analysis. Energy Journal, 16 (3), 89-111.

Sentis, K. & Li, L. (2000). HB plugging and chugging: How much is enough? In Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference (No. 8, pp. 207-219). Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software.

Shamir, M. & Shamir, J. (1995). Competing values in public opinion: A conjoint analysis. Political Behavior, 17 (1), 107-133.

Sheldon, R.J. & Steer, J.K. (1982). The use of conjoint analysis in transport research. Planning and Transport Research and Computation, 145-158.

Shepherd, D.A. (1999). Venture capitalists´ introspection: A comparison of ‚in use‘ and ‚espoused‘ decision policies. Journal of Small Business Management, 37 (2), 76-87.

Shepherd, D.A. (1999). Venture capitalists‘ assessment of new venture survival. Management Science, 45 (5), 621-632.

Sheth, J.N., Newman, B.I. & Gross, B.L. (1991). Chapter 2: Consumption values and market choices. Chapter 3: Functional and social values. In Consumption values and market choices: Theory and applications (pp. 16-49). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing Co.

Sheth, J.N., Newman, B.I. & Gross, B.L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22, 159-170.

Shi, L. & Olafsson, S. & Chen, Q. (1999). A new hybrid optimization algorithm. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 36 (2), 409-426.

Shi, L., Olafsson, S. & Chen, Q. (2001). An optimization framework for product design. Management Science, 47 (12), 1681-1692.

Shiell, A., Seymour, J., Hawe, P. & Cameron, S. (2000). Are preferences over health states complete? Health Economics, 9 (1), 47-55.

Shocker, A.D. & Srinivasan, V. (1979). Multiattribute approaches for product concept evaluation and generation: A critical review. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 159-180.

Silk, A.J. (1973). Preference and perception measures in new product development. In H.H. Kassarjian & T.S. Robertson (Eds.), Perspectives in consumer behavior, revised (pp. 42-55). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foreman and Company.

Simmons, S. & Esser, M. (2000). Developing business solutions from conjoint analysis. In A. Gustafsson, A. Herrmann & F. Huber (Eds.), Conjoint measurement - methods and applications (pp. 67-96). Berlin: Springer.

Simon, H. (1992). Pricing the ‘tiger’ with conjoint measurement. Pricing opportunities – and how to exploit them. Sloan Management Review, 33, 55-65.

Simon, H. (1993). High-Tech und Kundennutzen. In T. Reichmann (Ed.), Tagungsband Controlling `93 (S. 543-557). München: Techno-Verlag.

Singh, J., Cuttler, L., Shin, M., Silvers, J.B. & Neuhauser, D. (1998). Medical decision-making and the patient: Understanding preference patterns for growth hormone therapy using conjoint analysis. Medical Care, 36 (8), AS31-AS45.

Singh, M.J. & Kingsley, S. (1999). Matching candidates with job openings using web-based adaptive conjoint. In Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference (No. 7, pp. 123-130). Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software.

Siqueira, J. (1995). Mensuração da estrutura de preferência do consumidor: uma aplicação de Conjoint Analysis em Marketing. Dissertação (Mestrado) apresentada à Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo.

Smallwood, D.R. (1991a). Using conjoint analysis for price optimization. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1991 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 157-162). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Smallwood, D.R. (1991b). Comment on Huber and Fiedler. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1991 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 203-204). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Smith, S.L. (1989). Conjoint measurement. In Tourism analysis: A handbook (pp. 82-94). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Smith, S.M. (1988). Statistical software for conjoint analysis. In R.M. Johnson (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference of Perceptual Mapping, Conjoint Analysis, and Computer Interviewing (No. 2, pp. 109-115). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Smith, S.M. (1991). Simulating market choice in conjoint analysis. In W.D. Neal (Ed.), First Annual Advanced Research Techniques Forum, June 24-27, 1990, Beaver Creek, Colorado (pp. 22-31). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.

Smith, V.K. & Desvousges, W.H. (1986). Measuring water quality benefits. Norwell, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.

Spoth, R. & Redmond, C. (1993). Identifying program preferences through conjoint analysis: Illustrative results from a parent sample. American Journal of Health Promotion, 8 (2), 124-133.

Spoth, R. (1989). Applying conjoint analysis of consumer preferences to the development of utility-responsive health promotion programs. Special Issue: Cancer control. Health Education Research, 4, 439-449.

Spoth, R. (1990). Multi-attribute analysis of benefit managers' preferences for smoking cessation programs. Health Values, Health Behavior, Education and Promotion, 14 (5), 3-15.

SPSS (1998). SPSS conjoint 8.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.

Srinivasan, V. & deMaCarty, P. (1998). An alternative approach to the predictive validation of conjoint models. Working paper, Stanford University, CA.

Srinivasan, V. & Park, C.S. (1997). Surprising robustness of the self explicated approach to customer preference structure measurement. Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (May), 286-291.

Srinivasan, V. & Shocker, A.D. (1973). Estimating the weights for multiple attributes in a composite criterion using pairwise judgments. Psychometrika, 38, 473-493.

Srinivasan, V. & Shocker, A.D. (1973). Linear programming techniques for multi-dimensional analysis of preferences. Psychometrika, 38, 337-369.

Srinivasan, V. & Shocker, A.D. (1981). LINMAP version-IV - Users manual. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.

Srinivasan, V. & Weir, H. (1992). A conjoint analysis-based approach for determining benefit segments. June 1992 Advanced Research Techniques Forum, Lake Tahoe, NV.

Srinivasan, V. (1980). Comments on conjoint analysis and quantal choice models. Journal of Business, 53 (July), 547-550.

Srinivasan, V. (1988). A conjunctive-compensatory approach to the self-explication of multiattributed preferences. Decision Sciences, 19, 295-305.

Srinivasan, V. (1998). A strict paired comparison linear programming approach to nonmetric conjoint analysis. In J.E. Aronson & S. Zionts (Eds.), Operations research: Methods, models and applications (pp. 97-111). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

Srinivasan, V., Flaschsbart, P.G., Dajani, J.S. & Hartley, R.G. (1981). Forecasting the effectiveness of work-trip gasoline conservation policies through conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing, 45 (Summer), 157-172.

Srinivasan, V., Jain, A.K. & Malhotra, N.K. (1983). Improving predictive power of conjoint analysis by constrained parameter estimation. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 433-438.

Srinivasan, V., Wyner, G.A. (1989). CASEMAP: Computer-assisted self-explication of multiattributed preferences. In W. Henry, M. Menasco & H. Takada (Eds.), New product development and testing (pp. 91-111). Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

Stadie, E. (1998). Medial gestützte Limit Conjoint-Analyse als Innovationstest für technologische Basisinnovationen: eine explorative Analyse. Münster: Lit.

Stadtler, K. (1990). Conjoint Measurement. Marktforschungsreport, 13 (2), 3-9.

Stahl, B. (1988). Conjoint analysis by telephone. In R.M. Johnson (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference (No. 2, pp. 131-138). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Stallmeier, C.W. (1993). Die Bedeutung der Datenerhebungsmethode und des Untersuchungsdesigns für die Ergebnisstabilität der Conjoint-Analyse. Regensburg: Roderer.

Stanford, K., Hobbs, J.E., Gilbert, M., Jones, S.D.M., Price, M.A., Klein, K.K. & Kerr, W.A. (1999). Lamb-buying preferences of Canadian abattoirs and producer marketing groups: Implications for the Canadian supply chain. Supply Chain Management, 4 (2), 86-94.

Stanton, W.W. & Reese, R.M. (1983). Three conjoint segmentation approaches to the evaluation of advertising theme creation. Journal of Business Research, 11, 201-216.

Steckel, J.H. & O'shaughnessy, J. (1989). Towards a new way to measure power: Applying conjoint analysis to group decisions. Marketing Letters, 1 (1), 37-46.

Steckel, J.H. & Vanhonacker, W.R. (1993). Cross-validating regression models in marketing research. Marketing Science, 12 (4), 415-427.

Steckel, J.H., DeSarbo, W.S. & Mahajan, V. (1991). On the creation of acceptable conjoint analysis experimental designs. Decision Sciences, 22, 435-442.

Steenkamp, J.E.M. & Wedel, M. (1993). Fuzzy clusterwise regression in benefit segmentation: Application and investigation into its validity. Journal of Business Research, 26, 237-249.

Steenkamp, J.E.M. & Wittink, D.R. (1994). The metric quality of full-profile judgments and the number-of-attribute-levels effect in conjoint analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11, 275-286.

Stegmüller, B. & Hempel, P. (1996). Empirischer Vergleich unterschiedlicher Marktsegmentierungsansätze über die Segmentpopulation. Marketing ZFP, 18, 25-31.

Stegmüller, B. (1995). Internationale Marktsegmentierung als Grundlage für internationale Marketing-Konzeptionen. Bergisch Gladbach: Eul.

Steinberg, D. (1992). Applications of logit models in market research. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1992 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 405-424). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Steiner, W.J. & Hruschka, H. (2000). Conjointanalyse-basierte Produkt(linien)gestaltung unter Berücksichtigung von Konkurrenzreaktionen. OR Spektrum, 22 (1), 71-95.

Steiner, W.J. & Hruschka, H. (2001). A probabilistic one-step approach to the optimal product line design problem using conjoint and cost data. Regensburger Diskussionsbeiträge zur Wirtschaftswissenschaft (Nr. 360), Universität Regensburg.

Steiner, W.J. (1999). Optimale Neuproduktplanung. Entscheidungsmodelle und wettbewerbsorientierter Ansatz. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Univ.-Verlag.

Stevens, B. (2000, November 6). Save money with online analysis. Marketing News, 34 (23), 27-28.

Stevens, K.T. & Cline, K. (1998). Firing up the front line (bank brands). Banking Strategies, 74 (6), 34-38.

Stevens, T.H., Belkner, R., Dennis, D., Kittredge, D. & Willis, C. (2000). Comparison of contingent valuation and conjoint analysis in ecosystem management. Ecological Economics, 32, 63-74.

Steward, D.W. (1982). Models of consumer choice or models of the choice tasks? In R.K. Srivastava & A. D. Shocker (Eds.), Analytic approaches to product and marketing planning: The second conference (Report No. 82-109, pp. 165-176). Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

Stich, A. (1997). Herkunftszeichen als Qualitätssignal: Eine Erklärung der Nutzung eines extrinsischen Produktmerkmals als Qualitätssignal durch Konsumenten am Beispiel von Herkunftszeichen. Lohmar: Eul.

Stone, M. & Rasp, J. (1991). Tradeoffs in the choice between logit and OLS for accounting choice studies. The Accounting Review, 66 (1), 170-187.

Stotz, M. (1998). Die Erhebung von Preis-Absatz-Funktionen mittels der Conjoint-Analyse: Vergleich der Ergebnisse mit denen, die aus einfacher Befragung und Paarvergleich resultieren. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster.

Struhl, S. (1992). Comment on Chrzan and Grisaffe. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1992 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 243-244). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Struhl, S. (1994a). Discrete choice modeling comes to the PC. A review of CBC from Sawtooth Software and Ntelogit from Intelligent Marketing Systems. Quirk's Marketing Research Review, May, 12-41.

Struhl, S. (1994b). Discrete choice modeling: Understanding a "better conjoint than conjoint". Quirk's Marketing Research Review, June/July.

Struhl, S.M. (1991). Comment on Salling and Deegan. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1991 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 175-176). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Swait, J., Louviere, J. & Anderson, D. (1995). Best/worst conjoint: A new preference elicitation method to simultaneously identify overall attribute importance and attribute level partworths. Working paper, Intelliquest, Inc.

Swallow, S., Opaluch, J. & Weaver, T. (1992). Siting noxious facilities: an approach that integrates technical, economic and political consideration. Land Economics, 68, 283-301.

Swenson, M.J., Swinyard, W.R., Langrehr, F.W. & Smith, S.M. (1993). The appeal of personal selling as a career: A decade later. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 13 (1), 51-64.

Swinnen, G. (1983). Decisions on product-mix changes in supermarket chains. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UFSIA, Antwerp University, Belgium.

Swoboda, B. (2000). Messung von Einkaufsstaettenpraeferenzen auf der Basis der Conjoint-Analyse. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 60 (2), 149-166.

Szeinbach, S.L., Barnes, J.H. & Garner, D.D. (1997). Use of pharmaceutical manufacturers´ value-added services to build customer loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 40 (3), 229-236.

Szeinbach, S.L., Barnes, J.H., McGhan, W.F., Murawski, M.M. & Corey, R. (1999). Using conjoint analysis to evaluate health state preferences. Drug Information Journal, 33 (3), 849-858.