M
Maas,
A. & Wakker, P. (1994). Additive conjoint measurement for
multiattribute utility. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38, 86-101.
MacCrimmon, K.R. & Siu, J.K.
(1974). Making trade-offs. Decision Sciences, 5, 680-704.
MacKenzie, J. (1992). Evaluating
recreation trip attributes and travel time via conjoint analysis. Journal of
Leisure Research, 24 (2), 171-184.
MacKenzie, J. (1993). A comparison
of contingent preference models. American Journal of Agriculture Economics, 75,
593-603.
MacLachlan,
D.L. & Mulhern, M.G. (1991). Measuring brand equity with
conjoint analysis. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1991 Sawtooth Software Conference
Proceedings (pp. 127-140). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.
MacLachlan,
D.L., Mulhern, M.G. & Shocker, A.D. (1988). Attribute
selection and representation in conjoint analysis: Reliability and validity
issues. In R.M. Johnson (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software
Conference of Perceptual Mapping, Conjoint Analysis, and Computer Interviewing
(No. 2, pp. 25-35). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.
MacLauchlan, W.G. (1991a). Scaling
prior utilities in Sawtooth Software's adaptive conjoint analysis. In M.
Metegrano (Ed.), 1991 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp.
251-268). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.
MacLauchlan,
W.G. (1991b). Comment on Chrzan. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1991
Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 229-230). Ketchum, ID:
Sawtooth Software.
Madansky, A. (1980). On conjoint
analysis and quantal choice models. Journal of Business, 53 (3),
537-544.
Madhav, N.S. (1982). Reliability
of conjoint analysis: Contrasting data collection procedures. Journal of
Marketing Research, 19, 139-143.
Magat, W.A., Viskusi, W.K. &
Huber, J. (1988). Paired comparison and contingent valuation approaches to
morbidity risk valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,
15, 395-411.
Mahajan, V., Green, P.E. &
Goldberg, S.M. (1982). A conjoint model for measuring self- and cross-price/
demand relationsships. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 334-342.
Malhotra, N.K. & Jain, A.K.
(1982). A conjoint analysis approach to health care marketing and planning. Journal
of Health Care Marketing, 2, 35-44.
Malhotra, N.K. (1982). Stuctural
reliability and stability of nonmetric conjoint analysis. Journal of
Marketing Research, 19, 199-207.
Mallou, J.V., Boubeta, A.R. &
Tobio, T.B. (2001). Consumer preferences and brand equity measurement of
Spanish national daily newspapers: A conjoint analysis approach. Spanish
Journal of Psychology, 4 (1), 48-54.
Manrai, A.K. (1995). Mathematical
models of brand choice behavior. European Journal of Operational Research,
82 (1), 1-17.
Manrai, A.K., Manrai, L.A. &
Jagpal, S. (1993). Heteroscedasticity in conjoint analysis: Problem,
diagnosis, and treatment. Paper presented at the Marketing Science
Conference, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
Manrai, A.K., Manrai, L.A. &
Jagpal, S. (1993). Is the OLS driven conjoint analysis adequate for product
design, product positioning, and market segmentation? In Chias et al. (Eds.), Marketing
for the new Europe: Dealing with complexity (22nd Annual conference)
(pp. 1653-1657). European Marketing Academy.
Mantrale,
M.K., Sinha, P. & Zoltners, A.A. (1994). Structuring
a multiproduct sales quota-bonus plan for a heterogeneous sales force: A
practical model-based approach. Marketing Science, 13, 121-144.
Marcel, G.J., Youngkin, H. &
Anthony, B. (1996). Reposable medical device development - creatively
meeting customers' needs (applied conjoint analysis & QFD). Paper
Presentation, The Eighth Symposium on Quality Function Deployment and
International Symposium on QFD '96, Novi, Michigan, June 9-11, 1996.
Marcus,
B.H. & Tauber, E.M. (1979). "Trade-off analysis" in
marketing analysis and decision making. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company,
pp. 274-280.???
Markham, F.W., Diamond, J.J. &
Hermansen, C.L. (1999). The use of conjoint analysis to study patient
satisfaction. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 22 (3), 371-378.
Marshall, D. (1999). Convention
interviewing - convenience or reality? In Proceedings of the Sawtooth
Software Conference (No. 7, pp. 33-42). Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software.
Martin, J. & Moore, T.E.
(1993). Conjoint analysis: A tool for designing degree programs. Journal of
Marketing for Higher Education, 4 (1-2), 379-403.
Marzocchi, G.L., Brasini, S. &
Rimessi, M. (2000). New product development in the software
industry: The role of conjoint analysis. In A. Gustafsson, A. Herrmann & F.
Huber (Eds.), Conjoint measurement - methods and applications (pp.
135-160). Berlin:
Springer.
Maser, R. (1997). Wann ist ein Preis optimal? Beispiele empirischer Preisfindung. Planung und Analyse, 5, 48-51.
Matanovich,
T., Lilien, G.L. & Rangaswamy, A. (1999). Engineering
the price-value relationship. Marketing Management, 8 (1), 48-53.
Mattila, A. (1999). Consumers'
value judgements. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 40
(1), 40-46.
Maurice, H., Horst, H.S., Horne,
P.L.M. van &Dijkhuizen, A.A. (1999). Economic analysis of animal welfare
aspects in the broiler production chain. Society for Veterinary Epidemiology
and Preventive Medicine Proceedings, 182-196.
Mayall, P.D. & Winzar, H.F.
(1993a, December). Inter-bank comparison of criteria affecting loan
assessment. Paper presented at the Australian Finance Educators'
Conference, University of New South Wales.
Mayall, P.D. & Winzar, H.F.
(1993b). Loan officer loan assessment: A conjoint analysis (Commerce
Faculty Seminar Series). Murdoch University.
Mayall, P.D. & Winzar, H.F.
(1995, July). Measuring the adherence of corporate loan officers to bank
lending guidelines: An Australian study. Paper presented at the Proceedings
of the Third Management Control Systems Symposium, London.
Mazanec, J. (1980). Über den Einsatz der Verbundmessung zur indirekten Erfassung der Präferenzwirksamkeit einzelner Produkteigenschaften. Ein Anwendungsbeispiel für "Sparformen". Zeitschrift für Markt-, Meinungs- und Zukunftsforschung, 23-24, 5261-5289.
Mazumdar, T. (1993). A value-based
orientation to new product planning. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10
(1), 28-41.
McClain, J.O. & Rao, V.R.
(1974). Trade-offs and conflicts in evaluation of health system alternatives:
Methodology for analysis. Health Service Research, 9, 35.
McCullough, D. (1999). The number
of levels effect: A proposed solution. In Proceedings of the Sawtooth
Software Conference (No. 7, pp. 109-116). Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software.
McCullough, D. (2000). An
examination of the components of the NOL effect in full-profile conjoint
models. In Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference (No. 8, pp.
125-139). Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software.
McCullough, J. & Best, R.
(1979). Conjoint measurement: Temporal stability and structural reliability. Journal
of Marketing Research, 19, 26-31.
McCullough, J. & Mundy, W.
(1977). Identification of housing market segments using partial preference
patterns. In Proceedings of the Southwestern Marketing Association (p.
39). Southwestern Marketing Association.
McCullough, J.M. (1978). Identification
of preference through conjoint measurement. Working Paper, University of
Arizona, College of Business Administration.
McDermott, J., Bacon, J.R., Pesek,
J., Gempesaw, C.M. & Tilmon, H.D. (1999). A conjoint analysis of paper
demand by commercial graphic designers. Agricultural and Resource Economics
Review, 28 (2), 182-189.
McFadden, D. (1970). Conditional
logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P.
Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105-142). New
York: Academic Press.
McFadden, D. (1976). Quantal
choice analysis: A survey. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5,
363-390.
McFadden, D. (1986). The choice
theory approach to market research. Marketing Science, 5, 275-295.
McIntosh, E. & Donaldson, C.
& Ryan, M. (1999). Recent advances in the methods of cost-benefit analysis
in healthcare - Matching the art to the science. Pharmacoeconomics,
15 (4), 357-367.
McLauchlan, W.G. (1991). Scaling
prior utilities in Sawtooth Software´s Adaptive Conjoint Analysis. In
M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1991 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings
(pp. 251-268). Sun Valley, ID: Sawtooth Software.
McLauchlan,
W.G. (1992). The predictive validity of derived versus stated
importance. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1992 Sawtooth Software Conference
Proceedings (pp. 285-311). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.
Mehta, R., Moore, W.L., Pavia, T.M.
(1992). An examination of the use of unacceptable levels in
conjoint analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (3), 470-476.
Melikides,
G. (1998). Schätzverfahren der Präferenzmessung. Unveröffentlichte
Diplomarbeit, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster.
Melles,
T. & Holling, H. (1998). Einsatz der Conjoint Analyse in Deutschland.
Eine Befragung von Anwendern. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript, Westfälische
Wilhelms-Universität Münster.
Melles, T. & Luzar, M. (1999). Einsatz der Conjoint-Analyse zur
Messung individueller Präferenzen via Internet. Manuskript und Präsentation zur
3. German Online Research Tagung vom 28.-29. Oktober in Nürnberg.
Melles,
T. (1996). Optimierung der Paarvergleichsaufgabe im Rahmen der adaptiven
Conjoint Analyse. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Westfälische
Wilhelms-Universität Münster.
Melles,
T., Laumann, R. & Holling, H. (2000). Validity
and reliability of online conjoint analysis. In Proceedings of the Sawtooth
Software Conference (No. 8, pp. 31-40). Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software.
Melles, T. & Möhle, K. (2002).
Mehrwertkonzepte und Marktforschung: Der Nutzen von Conjoint-Analysen. SMarkt, 2/02, 19-22.
Melles, T. & Schweitzer, A. (2002). Akzeptanz von alternativen Modellen der Schadenregulierung.
Kernergebnisse einer Untersuchung im Auftrag der avanturo GmbH. IVW Management Information,
St. Gallener Trendmonitor für Risiko- und Finanzmärkte, 5/02, 3-7.
Memoli, R. (1995). Analyses of
homogeneity and multidimensional analyses of preferences: An application for
the sociology of tourism [Italian]. Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale,
16 (47-48), 179-203.
Mengen, A. & Tacke, G. (1995). Methodengestütztes Automobil-Pricing mit Conjoint-Measurement. In H. Reuss (Hrsg.), Wettberwerbsvorteile im Automobilhandel. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus-Verlag.
Mengen, A. (1993). Konzeptgestaltung von Dienstleistungsprodukten - Eine Conjoint-Analyse im Luftfrachtmarkt unter Berücksichtigung der Qualitätsunsicherheit beim Dienstleistungskauf. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschl.
Menges,
R. (1996). Unsichere Präferenzen und der Gebrauch von
Informationsstrategien: Eine experimentelle Untersuchung am Beispiel
"Kaffee". Neuried: Ars Una.
Messier, W. & Emery, D.
(1980). Some cautionary notes on the use of conjoint measurement for human
judgment modeling. Decision Sciences, 11, 678-690.
Meulen, H.A.B. van der, de Snoo,
G.R. & Wossink, G.A.A. (1996). Farmers' perception of unsprayed crop edges
in the Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Management, 47 (3),
241-255.
Mevorach, B. (1997). The business
of elections. Quality & Quantity, 31 (4), 325-335.
Meyer, L. (1998). Predictive
accuracy of conjoint analysis by means of World Wide Web survey [Online]. Available:
http://www.lucameyer.com/kul/menu.htm.
Meyer, R. & Johnson, E.J.
(1995). Empirical generalization in the modeling of consumer choice. Marketing
Science, 14 (3 Pt. 2/2), G180-???.
Meyer, R.J. (1982). A dynamic
multiattribute model of consumer repeated choice behavior? In R.K. Srivastava
& A.D. Shocker (Eds.), Analytic approaches to product and marketing
planning: The second conference (Report No. 82-109, pp. 199-227). Cambridge,
MA: Marketing Science Institute.
Michell, J. (1988). Theoretical
note. Some problems in testing the double cancellation condition in conjoint
measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 32, 466-473.
Michell, J. (1990). An
introduction to the logic of psychological measurement. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
Michell, J. (1999). Measurement
in psychology: A critical history of a methodological concept. New York,
NY: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, J.T., Ogden, J.R. &
Latshaw, C.A. (1998). Using trade-off analysis to determine value-price
sensitivity of custom calling features. American Business Review, 1,
8-13.
Minno, J. (1986). Software
replaces paper in questionnaire writing / software updated to meet growing
market. Marketing News, 20 (1), 66-67.
Minor, L., Klopfenstein, K. &
Miller, R.V. (1992). Integrating conjoint results into decision making. In M.
Metegrano (Ed.), 1992 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp.
191-196). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.
Mishra, S., Umesh, U.N. &
Stem, D.E. (1989). Attribute importance weights in conjoint analysis: Bias and
precision. In T.K. Srull (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (No. 16,
pp. 605-611). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
Missler-Behr,
M. (2000). Constructing fuzzy utility values in conjoint
analysis. Beiträge
zur OR 2000 in Dresden, Gesellschaft für Operations Research.
Mittal,
V., Katrichis, J.M., Forkin, F. & Konkel, M. (1994). Does
satisfaction with multi-attribute products vary over time? In C.T. Allen &
D.R. John (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (No. 21, pp. 412-417). Provo,
UT: Association for Consumer Research.
Mizuno, M. (1997). Conjoint
analysis of consumer preferences in cyber space. Advances in Human Factors
Ergonomics, 21 (B), 475-478.
Mohn, N.C. (1989). Comparing
simulated purchase 'chip' testing and trade-off (conjoint) analysis. In Proceedings
of the Sawtooth Software Conference. Gaining a competitive advantage through
PC-based interviewing and analysis (Vol. 1, pp. 53-63). Ketchum, ID:
Sawtooth Software.
Mohn, N.C. (1990). Simulated
purchase 'chip' testing vs. tradeoff (conjoint) analysis - Coca Cola's
experience. Marketing Research, 2 (March), 49-54.
Mohn, N.C. (1995). Price research
for decision making. When setting prices, don't rely on judgement alone. Marketing
Research, 7 (1), 11-19.
Molin, E.J.E., Oppewal, H. &
Timmermans, H.J.P. (2000). A comparison of full profile and hierarchical
information integration conjoint methods to modeling group preferences. Marketing
Letters, 11 (2), 169-179.
Monroe, K.B. (1973). Buyer's
subjective perceptions of price. In Perspectives In H.H. Kassarjian & T.S.
Robertson, Consumer behavior (pp. 23-42). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foreman
and Company.
Montgomery, D.B. & Wittink,
D.R. (1980). The predictive validity of conjoint analysis for alternative
aggregation schemes. In D.B. Montgomery & D.R. Wittink (Eds.), Preceedings
of the first ORSA/ TIMS special interest conference on market measurement and
analysis (pp. 298-309). Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
Montgomery, D.B. (1986). Conjoint
calibration of the customer/competitor interface in industrial markets. In K.
Backhaus & D.T. Wilson (Eds.), Industrial marketing: A German-American
perspective (pp 297-319). Berlin: Springer.
Montgomery, D.B., Wittink, D.R.
& Glaze, T. (1977). A predictive test of individual level concept
evaluation and trade-off analysis (Research Paper No. 415). Stanford, CA:
Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
Mooney, G. (2000). Judging
goodness must come before judging quality - But what is the good of health
care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 12 (5), 389-394.
Moore, R. (1989). Using conjoint
strategically to enhance business engineering. In Proceedings of the
Sawtooth Software Conference. Gaining a competitive advantage through PC-based
interviewing and analysis (Vol. 1, pp. 241-249). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth
Software.
Moore, R. (1992). Doing conjoint
analysis on the telephone. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1992 Sawtooth Software
Conference Proceedings (pp. 245-251). Sun Valley, ID: Sawtooth Software.
Moore, W.L. & Holbrook, M.B.
(1990). Conjoint analysis on objects with environmentally correlated
attributes: The questionable importance of representative design. Journal of
Consumer Research, 16, 490-497.
Moore, W.L. & Semenik, R.J.
(1988). Measuring preference with hybrid conjoint analysis: The impact of a
different number of attributes in the master design. Journal of Business
Research, 16, 261-274.
Moore, W.L. (1980). Levels of
aggregation in conjoint analysis: An empirical comparison. Journal of
Marketing Research, 17, 516-523.
Moore, W.L. (1990). Factorial
preference structure. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 94-104.
Moore, W.L., Gray-Lee, J. &
Louviere, J.J. (1998). A cross-validity comparison of conjoint analysis and
choice models at different levels of aggregation. Marketing Letters, 9
(2), 195-208.
Moore, W.L., Louviere, J.J. &
Verma, R. (1999). Using conjoint analysis to help design product platforms. Journal
of Product Innovation Management, 16 (1), 27-39.
Moore, W.L., Myhta, R.B. &
Pavia, T.M. (1994). A simplified method of constrained parameter estimation in
conjoint analysis. Marketing Letters, 5 (2), 173-181.
Morgan, A., Shackley, P., Pickin,
M. & Brazier, J. (2000). Quantifying patient preferences for out-of-hours
primary care. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 5 (4),
214-218.
Morgan,
J.P. (1995). Computer simulation predicts employee response to
contemplated plan redesigns. Employee Benefit Plan Review, 24-27.
Morrison, M., Bennett, J., Blamey,
R. & Louviere, J. (2002). Choice modeling and tests of benefit transfer. American
Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84 (1), 161-170.
Morton, J. & Devine, H.J. Jr.
(1985) How to diagnose what buyers really want. Business Marketing,
Oct., 71-83.
Morton, J. & Dubanoski, T.J.
(1987). New behavioral model measures price elasticity. Marketing
News, 27 (February), 27.
Morton, J. & Rys, M.E. (1987).
Price elasticity prediction: New research tool for the competitive '80s, Marketing
News, 2 (January), 18.
Moskowitz,
H., Cohen, D., Krieger, B. & Rabino, S. (2001). Interest
and reaction time analysis of credit card offers: Managerial implications of
high level research procedures. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 6
(2), 172-189.
Moskowitz,
H.R. & Cohen, D. (1999). How features of pictures in
concepts drive semantic scales profiles and purchase intent utilities in a conjoint
task: The case of coffee. Canadian Journal of Market Research, in press.
Moskowitz,
H.R. & Gofman, A. (2000, April). Research,
politics and the web can mix! Considerations, experiences, trials, tribulations
in adapting conjoint measurement to optimising a political position as if it
were a consumer product. Paper presented at The Worldwide
Internet Conference and Exhibition Net Effects 3, Dublin, Ireland.
Moskowitz, H.R. & Martin, J.G. (1993). How computer aided design and presentation of concept speeds up the product development process. In Proceedings of the 46th ESOMAR Conference (pp. 405-419). Copenhagen: ESOMAR.
Moskowitz,
H.R. (1994). Incorporating consumer feedback into package
description and presentation: A multi-media approach.
Paper presented at the Conference of Packaging Research with Consumers of the
American Society for Testing & Materials, Montreal, Canada.
Moskowitz, H.R. (1996a).
Segmenting consumers on the basis of their responses to concept elements: An
approach derived from product research. Canadian Journal of Market Research,???.
Moskowitz,
H.R. (1996b). Segmenting consumers world-wide by multi-media
conjoint methods. Unpublished Paper, White Plains, New York:
Moskowitz Jacobs Inc.
Moskowitz, H.R. (1996c). Segmenting consumers world-wide: An application of multiple media conjoint methods. Proceedings of the 49th E.S.O.M.A.R. Congress (pp. 535-552). Istanbul: ESOMAR.
Moskowitz,
H.R., Cofman, A. & Krieger, B. (1996). Accelerating
development at the fuzzy front end: Combing ideation & evaluation in a
consumer based paradigm. Paper submitted at the 1996 PDMA
Research Conference.
Moskowitz, H.R., Gofman, A. &
Tungaturthy, P. (1996). Multi-media development and optimization of concepts
for a fast food restaurant. Unpublished Paper, Moskowitz Jacobs Inc., White
Plains, New York.
Moyo, P.S. (2002). Discrete
choice analysis of the feed technology decisions of smallholder dairy farmers
in Zimbabwe. Microfiche, National Library of Canada,
Ottawa.
Muhlbacher,
H. & Botschen, G. (1988). The use of trade-off analysis for
the design of holiday travel packages. Journal of Business Research, 17,
117-131.
Mühlbacher,
H. & Botschen, G. (1988). The use of trade-off analysis for
the design of holiday travel packages. Journal of Business Research, 17,
117-131.
Mühlbacher, H. (1988). Conjoint-Analyse: Präferenzforschung für Marketing-Mix-Entscheidungen. Viertel-Jahresheft für Media- und Werbewirkung, 2, 11-16.
Mukhopadhyay,
S.K. & Bhandari, C. (1997). Conjoint measurement approach for
machine part grouping in manufacturing cell formation. International Journal
of Production Research, 35 (8), 2237-2251.
Mulhern,
M.G. (1999). Assessing the relative efficiency of fixed and randomized
experimental designs. In Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference
(No. 7, pp. 225-232). Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software.
Müller,
J.C. (2001). Empirische Überprüfung der gebrückten Conjoint-Analyse anhand
von Präferenzen für Supermärkte. Diplomarbeit, Universität Eichstätt,
Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät Ingolstadt.
Müller,
M. & Schmitz, P.M. (1999). Pricing the environment:
Measurement of preferences and willingness to pay for selected landscape
functions by the conjoint analysis. Zeitschrift für Kulturtechnik und Landentwicklung, 40 (5/6), 213-219.
Müller,
M., Thiele, H. & Wronka, T.C. (1999). Forschungsansätze zur Ermittlung
regionaler Präferenzen für Landschaftsfunktionen: Conjoint-Analyse und
Contingent-Valuation-Methode. Agrarwirtschaft, 48 (10), 386-388.
Müller, S. & Kesselmann, P. (1994). Die Preisbereitschaft von Konsumenten bei umweltfreundlich verpackten Produkten - Ergebnisse einer Conjoint-Analyse. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 3, 260-278.
Müller,
S. & Kesselmann, P. (1995). Made in Sachsen: Das Eigenschaftsprofil der
"Konsumpatrioten". Jahrbuch für Absatz- und Verbrauchsforschung,
41, 407-421.
Müller, S. & Kesselmann, P. (1996). Buy Regional: Der Stellenwert des "Made in Sachsen" für die Kaufentscheidung ostdeutscher Konsumenten. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 56 (3), 363-377.
Müller-Hagedorn, L., Sewing, E. & Toporowski, W. (1993). Zur Validität von Conjoint-Analysen. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 45 (2), 123-148.
Mullet, G.M. & Karson, M.J.
(1986). Percentiles of LINMAP conjoint indices of fit for various orthogonal
arrays: A simulation study. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 286-290.
Mulye, R. (1998). An empirical
comparison of three variants of the AHP and two variants of conjoint analysis. Journal
of Behavioral Decision Making, 11 (4), 263-280.
Mummalaneni, V., Dubas, K.M. &
Chao, C. (1996). Chinese purchasing managers' preferences and
trade-offs in supplier selection and performance evaluation. Industrial
Marketing Management, 25, 115-124.
Musiol,
G. & Sladkowski, A. (1998). Beurteilung von Risikofaktoren beim
Versandkauf mittels Conjoint- bzw. Clusteranalyse (Beiträge des Instituts
für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung, Nr. 64). Osnabrück: Universität, Institut
für empirische Wirtschaftsforschung.