Laakmann, K. (1995). Value-Added Services als Profilierungsinstrument im Wettbewerb: Analyse, Generierung und Bewertung. Frankfurt a.M.: Lang.

Laker, M. (1992). Pricing im Maschinen-/Anlagenbau. Thexis, 9, 41-46.

Landstrom, H. (1998). Informal investors as entrepreneurs. Technovation, 18 (5), 321-333.

Lans, I.A. van der & Heiser, W.J. (1992). Constrained part-worth estimation in conjoint analysis using the self-explicated utility model. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 9, 325-344.

Lanwehr, R. (1998). Die adaptive Conjoint Analyse in der Berufsorientierung. Entwicklung und Validierung eines Beratungssystems. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster.

Lattin, T. (1990). High-tech helping to target guests’ preferences. Hotel & Motel Management, 20-.

Laumann, R. (1997). Schätzmethoden bei dem Paarvergleich in der Conjoint-Analyse. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster.

Lauro, C.N., Giordano, G. & Verde, R. (1998). A multidimensional approach to conjoint analysis. Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, 14 (4), 265-274.

Lazari, A.G. & Anderson, D.A. (1994). Designs of discrete choice set experiments for estimating both attribute and availability cross effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 375-383.

Leach, M.P. & Liu, A.H. (1997). Applying conjoint analysis to international markets: A cross-cultural comparison of model fit. Developments in Marketing Science, 20, 69-73.

Lee, A., Lum, M.E., Beehan, S.J. & Hillman, K.M. (1996). Interhospital transfers: Decision-making in critical care areas. Critical Care Medicine, 24 (4), 618-622.

Lee, D.D. (1984). Chapter 10: Information systems, models, and simulation. In Industrial marketing research: Techniques and practices (2nd ed., pp. 103-122). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

Lee, J.K., Geistfeld, L.V. (1998). Enhancing consumer choice: Are we making appropriate recommendations? Journal of Consumer Affairs, 32 (2), 227-251.

Lee, M. & Lou, Y. (1996). Consumer reliance on intrinsic and extrinsic cues in product evaluations: a conjoint approach. Journal of Applied Business Research, 12 (Winter), 21-29.

Lefkoff-Hagius, R. & Mason, C.H. (1993). Characteristic, beneficial, and image attributes in consumer judgments of similarity and preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 100-110.

Lego, R. & Shaw, R.N. (1992). Convergent validity in tourism research: An empirical analysis. Tourism Management, December, 387-393.

Lehman, J.M., Bacon, J.R. & Toensmeyer, C. (1997). Impact of farmer direct market attributes on consumer preference: A conjoint analysis by consumer market location. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79 (5), 1708-1708.

Leigh, T.W., MacKay, D.B. & Summers, J.O. (1981). On alternative experimental methods for conjoint analysis. In K.B. Monroe (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (No. 8). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.

Leigh, T.W., MacKay, D.B. & Summers, J.O. (1984). Reliability and validity of conjoint analysis and self-explicated weights: A comparison. Journal of Marketing Research, 21, 456-462.

Lender, P. (1997). Der Markt für "Urlaub auf dem Bauernhof" in Schleswig-Holstein: Eine Analyse von Angebot und Nachfrage unter Berücksichtigung der Conjoint-Analyse. Frankfurt a.M.: Lang.

Lenk, P.J., DeSarbo, W.S., Green, P.E. & Young, M.R. (1996). Hierarchical Bayes conjoint analysis: Recovery of partworth heterogeneity from reduced experimental designs. Marketing Science, 15 (2), 173-191.

Lerman, S.R. & Louviere, J.J. (1978). Using functional measurement to identify the form of utility functions in travel demand models. Transportation Research Record, 673, 78-86.

Levin, E.J. & Wright, R.E. (2001). Unemployment insurance, moral hazard, and economic growth. International Advances in Economic Research, 7 (4), 373-484.

Levin, I.P. & Gaeth, G.J. (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 374-378.

Levy, A., Teisl, M.F., Roe, B., Russell, M., Moskovitz, D. & Austin, T. (1998, August). Electricity deregulation: What´s in store for the environment? Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, UT.

Levy, M. (1981). Diminishing return for customer service. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Materials Management, 11 (1), 14-24.

Levy, M., Webster, J. & Kerin, R.A. (1983). Formulating push market strategies: A method and application. Journal of Marketing, 47, 25-34.

Lewin, G., Jeuland, A. & Struhl, S. (1992). An empirical investigation of learning effects in conjoint research. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1992 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 257-269). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Lewis, R.C., Ding, S. & Geschke, U. (1991). Using trade-off analysis to measure consumer choices: The full profile method. Hospitality Research Journal, 15 (1), 75-92.

Lieber, S. (1976). A comparison of metric and nonmetric scaling models in preference research. In R.G. Golledge & G. Rushton (Eds.), Spatial choice and spatial behavior. Columbus, OH, Ohio State University press.

Lieber, S.R. & Fesenmaier, D.R. (1984). Modelling recreation choice: A case study of management alternatives in Chicago. Regional Studies, 18, 31-43.

Lim, J., Olshavsky, R.W. & Kim, J. (1988). The impact of inferences on product evaluations: Replication and extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 308-316.

Loader, R. (1990). The use of conjoint analysis in the purchase of fruit and vegetables. Unpublished paper, University of Reading, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management.

Loosschilder, G.H., Rosbergen, E., Vriens, M. & Wittink, D.R. (1995). Pictorial stimuli in conjoint analysis - to support product styling decisions. Journal of the Market Research Society, 37 (1), 17-34.

Louviere J.J. & Gaeth, G.J. (1987). Decomposing the determinants of retail facility choice using the method of hierarchical information integration: A supermarket illustration. Journal of Retailing, 63, 25-48.

Louviere, J., Hensher, D. & Swait, J. (2000). Conjoint preference elicitation methods in the broader context of random utility theory preference elicitation methods. In A. Gustafsson, A. Herrmann & F. Huber (Eds.), Conjoint measurement - methods and applications (pp. 279-318). Berlin: Springer.

Louviere, J.J. & Gaeth, G.J. (1988). A comparison of rating and choice responses in conjoint analysis. In R.M. Johnson (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference of Perceptual Mapping, Conjoint Analysis, and Computer Interviewing (No. 2, pp. 59-73). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Louviere, J.J. & Johnson, R.D. (1990). Reliability and validity of the brand-anchored conjoint approach to measuring retailer images. Journal of Retailing, 66 (4), 359-382.

Louviere, J.J. & Kaciak, E. (1989). A comparison of several approaches for inferring individual and aggregate attribute effects in pairwise comparison conjoint choice tasks. In T.K. Srull (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (No. 16, pp. 612-618). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

Louviere, J.J. & Meyer, R.J. (1981). A composite attitude-behavior model of traveler decision making. Transportation Research, 15B, 411-420.

Louviere, J.J. & Timmermans, H.J. (1992). Testing the external validity of hierarchical conjoint analysis models of recreational destination choice. Leisure Sciences, 14, 179-194.

Louviere, J.J. & Timmermans, H.J.P. (1990). Stated preference and choice models applied in recreation research: A review. Leisure Sciences, 12, 9-32.

Louviere, J.J. & Woodworth, G. (1983). Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice of allocation experiments. An approach based on aggregate data. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 350-367.

Louviere, J.J. & Woodworth, G.G. (1988). On the design and analysis of correlated conjoint experiments using difference designs. In M.J. Houston (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (No. 15, pp. 510-517). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

Louviere, J.J. (1974). Predicting the evaluation of real stimulus objects from an abstract evaluation of their attributes: The case of trout streams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 572-577.

Louviere, J.J. (1983). Integrating conjoint and functional measurement with discrete choice theory: An experimental design approach. In Advances in consumer research (No. 10, pp. 151-156). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

Louviere, J.J. (1984). Hierarchical information integration: A new method for the design and analysis of complex multiattribute judgment problems. In T.C. Kinnear (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (No. , pp. 148-155). Provo, UT: Association of Consumer Research.

Louviere, J.J. (1986). A conjoint model for analyzing new product positions in a differentiated market with price competition. In Advances in consumer research (No. 13, 375-380). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

Louviere, J.J. (1987). An experimental design approach to the development of conjoint based simulation systems with an application to forecasting future retirement choices. In R.J.G. Golledge & H.G. Timmermans (Eds.), Behavioral modeling in geography and planning. London, UK: Croom-Helm.

Louviere, J.J. (1988a). Analyzing decision making: Metric conjoint analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Louviere, J.J. (1988b). Modeling individual decisions: Metric conjoint analysis. Sage University Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No. 67. Newbury Park, Ca: Sage Publications.

Louviere, J.J. (1988c). Conjoint analysis modeling of stated preferences: A review of theory, methods, recent developments and external validity. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 10, 93-119.

Louviere, J.J. (1991). Experimental choice analysis: Introduction and review. Journal of Business Research, 23, 291-297.

Louviere, J.J. (1992). Maximum difference conjoint: Theory, methods and cross-task comparisons with ratings-based and yes/no full profile conjoint. Unpublished Paper, Department of Marketing, Eccles School of Business, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

Louviere, J.J. (1994). Conjoint analysis. In R. Bagozzi (Ed.), Handbook of marketing research (pp. 223-259). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Louviere, J.J., Beavers, L.L., Norman, K.L. & Stetzer, F. (1972). Theory, methodology and findings in mode choice behavior. Working Paper No. 11, Institute of Urban and Regional Research, University of Iowa.

Louviere, J.J., Fox, M.F. & Moore, W.L. (1993). Cross-task validity comparisons of stated preference choice models. Marketing Letters, 4 (3), 205-213.

Louviere, J.J., Meyer, R.J., Bunch, D.S., Carson, R., Dellaert, B., Hanemann, W.M., Hensher, D. & Irwin, J. (1999). Combining sources of preference data for modeling complex decision processes. Marketing Letters, 10 (3), 205-217.

Louviere, J.J., Schroeder, H., Louviere, C.H. & Woodworth, G.G. (1986). Do the parameters of choice models depend on differences in stimulus presentation: Visual versus verbal presentation? In M. Wallendorf & P. Anderson (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (No. 14, pp. 79-82). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

Loveland, K.A. (1995). Conjoint analysis reliability and validity: The impact of self efficacy, self assessments, and selected methodological choices. Dissertation, New-Mexico-State-University.

Luce, R.D. & Tukey, J.W. (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 1-27.

Luce, R.D. (1966). Two extensions of conjoint measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 3, 348-370.

Luce, R.D. (1978). Conjoint measurement. In C.A. Hooker, Leach & E.F. McClennen (Eds.), Foundations and applications of decision theory (Vol. 1, pp. 311-336). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Luce, R.D. (1996). The ongoing dialog between empirical science and measurement theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 40, 78-98.

Luce, R.D. (2000). Utility of gains and losses: Measurement-theoretical and experimental approaches. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Lue, C., Crompton, J. & Stewart, W. (1996). Evidence of cumulative attraction in multidestination recreational trip decisions. Journal of Travel Research, 35 (Summer), 41-49.

Lukas, J. (1985). COMESCAL: A microcomputer program for testing axioms and finding scale values for conjoint measurement data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 17, 129-130.

Lund, D.B. & Smith, A.E. (1990). The effect of transforming the dependent variable on predictive validity in OLS conjoint estimation procedure. In B.J. Dunlap (Ed.), Developments in marketing science. Proceedings of the thirteenth annual conference of the Academy of Marketing Science (Vol. 13, pp. 380-384). Cullowhee, NC: Academy of Marketing Science.

Lund, D.B., Malhotra, N.K. & Smith, A.E. (1988). Field validation study of conjoint analysis using selected mail survey response rate facilitators. Journal of Business Research, 16, 351-368.

Lutz, T. (1979). Conjoint Measurement als Instrument der Absatzforschung. Marketing ZFP, 1 (3), 199-211.

Lynch, J., Buzas, T. & Berg, S. (1994). Regulatory measurement and evaluation of telephone service quality. Management Science, 40 (Feb.), 169-194.

Lynch, J.G. (1979). Why additive utility models fail as descriptions of choice behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 397-417.

Lynch, J.G. Jr. (1985). Uniqueness issues in the decompositional modeling of multiattribute overall evaluations: An information integration perspective. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 1-19.