L
Laakmann, K. (1995). Value-Added Services als Profilierungsinstrument im Wettbewerb: Analyse, Generierung und Bewertung. Frankfurt a.M.: Lang.
Laker,
M. (1992). Pricing im Maschinen-/Anlagenbau. Thexis, 9, 41-46.
Landstrom, H. (1998). Informal investors as entrepreneurs. Technovation, 18 (5), 321-333.
Lans, I.A. van der & Heiser, W.J. (1992). Constrained part-worth estimation in conjoint analysis using the self-explicated utility model. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 9, 325-344.
Lanwehr,
R. (1998). Die adaptive Conjoint Analyse in der Berufsorientierung.
Entwicklung und Validierung eines Beratungssystems. Unveröffentlichte
Diplomarbeit, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster.
Lattin, T. (1990). High-tech helping to target guests’ preferences. Hotel & Motel Management, 20-.
Laumann,
R. (1997). Schätzmethoden bei dem Paarvergleich in der Conjoint-Analyse.
Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster.
Lauro,
C.N., Giordano, G. & Verde, R. (1998). A multidimensional approach to
conjoint analysis. Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, 14 (4),
265-274.
Lazari,
A.G. & Anderson, D.A. (1994). Designs of discrete choice set experiments
for estimating both attribute and availability cross effects. Journal of
Marketing Research, 31, 375-383.
Leach,
M.P. & Liu, A.H. (1997). Applying conjoint analysis to international
markets: A cross-cultural comparison of model fit. Developments in Marketing
Science, 20, 69-73.
Lee, A., Lum, M.E., Beehan, S.J. & Hillman, K.M. (1996). Interhospital transfers: Decision-making in critical care areas. Critical Care Medicine, 24 (4), 618-622.
Lee, D.D. (1984). Chapter 10: Information systems, models, and simulation. In Industrial marketing research: Techniques and practices (2nd ed., pp. 103-122). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Lee, J.K., Geistfeld, L.V. (1998). Enhancing consumer choice: Are we making appropriate recommendations? Journal of Consumer Affairs, 32 (2), 227-251.
Lee, M. & Lou, Y. (1996). Consumer reliance on intrinsic and extrinsic cues in product evaluations: a conjoint approach. Journal of Applied Business Research, 12 (Winter), 21-29.
Lefkoff-Hagius, R. & Mason, C.H. (1993). Characteristic, beneficial, and image attributes in consumer judgments of similarity and preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 100-110.
Lego, R. & Shaw, R.N. (1992). Convergent validity in tourism research: An empirical analysis. Tourism Management, December, 387-393.
Lehman, J.M., Bacon, J.R. & Toensmeyer, C. (1997). Impact of farmer direct market attributes on consumer preference: A conjoint analysis by consumer market location. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79 (5), 1708-1708.
Leigh, T.W., MacKay, D.B. & Summers, J.O. (1981). On alternative experimental methods for conjoint analysis. In K.B. Monroe (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (No. 8). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
Leigh, T.W., MacKay, D.B. &
Summers, J.O. (1984). Reliability and validity of conjoint analysis and
self-explicated weights: A comparison. Journal of Marketing Research, 21,
456-462.
Lender, P. (1997). Der Markt für "Urlaub auf dem Bauernhof" in Schleswig-Holstein: Eine Analyse von Angebot und Nachfrage unter Berücksichtigung der Conjoint-Analyse. Frankfurt a.M.: Lang.
Lenk, P.J., DeSarbo, W.S., Green,
P.E. & Young, M.R. (1996). Hierarchical Bayes conjoint analysis: Recovery
of partworth heterogeneity from reduced experimental designs. Marketing
Science, 15 (2), 173-191.
Lerman, S.R. & Louviere, J.J.
(1978). Using functional measurement to identify the form of utility functions
in travel demand models. Transportation Research Record, 673, 78-86.
Levin, E.J. & Wright, R.E.
(2001). Unemployment insurance, moral hazard, and economic growth. International
Advances in Economic Research, 7 (4), 373-484.
Levin, I.P. & Gaeth, G.J.
(1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information
before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15,
374-378.
Levy,
A., Teisl, M.F., Roe, B., Russell, M., Moskovitz, D. & Austin, T. (1998,
August). Electricity deregulation: What´s in store for the
environment? Paper presented at the American Agricultural
Economics Association Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, UT.
Levy, M. (1981). Diminishing
return for customer service. International Journal of Physical Distribution
and Materials Management, 11 (1), 14-24.
Levy,
M., Webster, J. & Kerin, R.A. (1983). Formulating
push market strategies: A method and application. Journal of Marketing, 47,
25-34.
Lewin,
G., Jeuland, A. & Struhl, S. (1992). An
empirical investigation of learning effects in conjoint research. In M.
Metegrano (Ed.), 1992 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp.
257-269). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.
Lewis,
R.C., Ding, S. & Geschke, U. (1991). Using
trade-off analysis to measure consumer choices: The full profile method. Hospitality
Research Journal, 15 (1), 75-92.
Lieber, S. (1976). A comparison of
metric and nonmetric scaling models in preference research. In R.G. Golledge
& G. Rushton (Eds.), Spatial choice and spatial behavior. Columbus,
OH, Ohio State University press.
Lieber,
S.R. & Fesenmaier, D.R. (1984). Modelling recreation
choice: A case study of management alternatives in Chicago. Regional
Studies, 18, 31-43.
Lim, J., Olshavsky, R.W. &
Kim, J. (1988). The impact of inferences on product evaluations: Replication
and extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 308-316.
Loader, R. (1990). The use of
conjoint analysis in the purchase of fruit and vegetables. Unpublished
paper, University of Reading, Department of Agricultural Economics and
Management.
Loosschilder,
G.H., Rosbergen, E., Vriens, M. & Wittink, D.R. (1995). Pictorial
stimuli in conjoint analysis - to support product styling decisions. Journal
of the Market Research Society, 37 (1), 17-34.
Louviere J.J. & Gaeth, G.J.
(1987). Decomposing the determinants of retail facility choice using the method
of hierarchical information integration: A supermarket illustration. Journal
of Retailing, 63, 25-48.
Louviere,
J., Hensher, D. & Swait, J. (2000). Conjoint
preference elicitation methods in the broader context of random utility theory
preference elicitation methods. In A. Gustafsson, A. Herrmann & F. Huber
(Eds.), Conjoint measurement - methods and applications (pp. 279-318). Berlin: Springer.
Louviere,
J.J. & Gaeth, G.J. (1988). A comparison of rating and choice
responses in conjoint analysis. In R.M. Johnson (Ed.), Proceedings of the
Sawtooth Software Conference of Perceptual Mapping, Conjoint Analysis, and
Computer Interviewing (No. 2, pp. 59-73). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.
Louviere, J.J. & Johnson, R.D.
(1990). Reliability and validity of the brand-anchored
conjoint approach to measuring retailer images. Journal of Retailing, 66
(4), 359-382.
Louviere, J.J. & Kaciak, E.
(1989). A comparison of several approaches for inferring
individual and aggregate attribute effects in pairwise comparison conjoint
choice tasks. In T.K. Srull (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (No.
16, pp. 612-618). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
Louviere, J.J. & Meyer, R.J.
(1981). A composite attitude-behavior model of traveler decision making. Transportation
Research, 15B, 411-420.
Louviere, J.J. & Timmermans, H.J.
(1992). Testing the external validity of hierarchical conjoint
analysis models of recreational destination choice. Leisure
Sciences, 14, 179-194.
Louviere, J.J. & Timmermans,
H.J.P. (1990). Stated preference and choice models applied in
recreation research: A review. Leisure Sciences, 12, 9-32.
Louviere, J.J. & Woodworth, G.
(1983). Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice of allocation
experiments. An approach based on aggregate data. Journal of Marketing
Research, 20, 350-367.
Louviere, J.J. & Woodworth,
G.G. (1988). On the design and analysis of correlated conjoint experiments
using difference designs. In M.J. Houston (Ed.), Advances in consumer
research (No. 15, pp. 510-517). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer
Research.
Louviere, J.J. (1974). Predicting
the evaluation of real stimulus objects from an abstract evaluation of their
attributes: The case of trout streams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59,
572-577.
Louviere, J.J. (1983). Integrating
conjoint and functional measurement with discrete choice theory: An
experimental design approach. In Advances in consumer research (No. 10,
pp. 151-156). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
Louviere, J.J. (1984). Hierarchical
information integration: A new method for the design and analysis of complex
multiattribute judgment problems. In T.C. Kinnear (Ed.), Advances in
consumer research (No. , pp. 148-155). Provo, UT: Association of Consumer
Research.
Louviere, J.J. (1986). A
conjoint model for analyzing new product positions in a differentiated market
with price competition. In Advances in consumer research (No. 13,
375-380). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
Louviere, J.J. (1987). An
experimental design approach to the development of conjoint based simulation
systems with an application to forecasting future retirement choices. In R.J.G.
Golledge & H.G. Timmermans (Eds.), Behavioral modeling in geography and
planning. London, UK: Croom-Helm.
Louviere, J.J. (1988a). Analyzing
decision making: Metric conjoint analysis. Newbury
Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Louviere, J.J. (1988b). Modeling
individual decisions: Metric conjoint analysis. Sage
University Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No. 67.
Newbury Park, Ca: Sage Publications.
Louviere, J.J. (1988c). Conjoint
analysis modeling of stated preferences: A review of theory, methods, recent
developments and external validity. Journal of Transport Economics and
Policy, 10, 93-119.
Louviere, J.J. (1991). Experimental
choice analysis: Introduction and review. Journal of Business Research, 23,
291-297.
Louviere, J.J. (1992). Maximum
difference conjoint: Theory, methods and cross-task comparisons with
ratings-based and yes/no full profile conjoint. Unpublished
Paper, Department of Marketing, Eccles School of Business, University of Utah,
Salt Lake City.
Louviere, J.J. (1994). Conjoint
analysis. In R. Bagozzi (Ed.), Handbook of marketing research (pp.
223-259). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Louviere,
J.J., Beavers, L.L., Norman, K.L. & Stetzer, F. (1972). Theory,
methodology and findings in mode choice behavior. Working
Paper No. 11, Institute of Urban and Regional Research, University of Iowa.
Louviere, J.J., Fox, M.F. &
Moore, W.L. (1993). Cross-task validity comparisons of stated preference choice
models. Marketing Letters, 4 (3), 205-213.
Louviere, J.J., Meyer, R.J.,
Bunch, D.S., Carson, R., Dellaert, B., Hanemann, W.M., Hensher, D. & Irwin,
J. (1999). Combining sources of preference data for modeling complex decision
processes. Marketing Letters, 10 (3), 205-217.
Louviere, J.J., Schroeder, H.,
Louviere, C.H. & Woodworth, G.G. (1986). Do the parameters of choice models
depend on differences in stimulus presentation: Visual versus verbal presentation?
In M. Wallendorf & P. Anderson (Eds.), Advances in consumer research
(No. 14, pp. 79-82). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
Loveland, K.A. (1995). Conjoint
analysis reliability and validity: The impact of self efficacy, self
assessments, and selected methodological choices. Dissertation,
New-Mexico-State-University.
Luce, R.D. & Tukey, J.W.
(1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental
measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 1-27.
Luce, R.D. (1966). Two
extensions of conjoint measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 3,
348-370.
Luce, R.D. (1978). Conjoint
measurement. In C.A. Hooker, Leach & E.F. McClennen (Eds.), Foundations
and applications of decision theory (Vol. 1, pp. 311-336). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Luce,
R.D. (1996). The ongoing dialog between empirical science and
measurement theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 40, 78-98.
Luce, R.D. (2000). Utility
of gains and losses: Measurement-theoretical and experimental approaches.
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lue, C., Crompton, J. & Stewart,
W. (1996). Evidence of cumulative attraction in multidestination
recreational trip decisions. Journal of Travel Research, 35 (Summer),
41-49.
Lukas, J. (1985). COMESCAL: A
microcomputer program for testing axioms and finding scale values for conjoint
measurement data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 17,
129-130.
Lund, D.B. & Smith, A.E.
(1990). The effect of transforming the dependent variable on predictive
validity in OLS conjoint estimation procedure. In B.J. Dunlap (Ed.), Developments
in marketing science. Proceedings of the thirteenth annual conference of the
Academy of Marketing Science (Vol. 13, pp. 380-384). Cullowhee, NC: Academy
of Marketing Science.
Lund, D.B., Malhotra, N.K. &
Smith, A.E. (1988). Field validation study of conjoint analysis using selected
mail survey response rate facilitators. Journal of Business Research, 16,
351-368.
Lutz,
T. (1979). Conjoint Measurement als Instrument der Absatzforschung. Marketing
ZFP, 1 (3), 199-211.
Lynch, J., Buzas, T. & Berg,
S. (1994). Regulatory measurement and evaluation of telephone service quality. Management
Science, 40 (Feb.), 169-194.
Lynch, J.G. (1979). Why additive
utility models fail as descriptions of choice behavior. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 397-417.
Lynch, J.G. Jr. (1985). Uniqueness
issues in the decompositional modeling of multiattribute overall evaluations:
An information integration perspective. Journal of Marketing Research, 22,
1-19.