G

Gallivan, D.M. (1990). A conjoint analysis study of the preferences of recreational swimming service users. M.A. Thesis, University of Alberta, Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies.

Gan, C. & Luzar, E.J. (1993). A conjoint analysis of waterfowl hunting in Louisiana. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 25, 36-45.

Gan, C. (1992). A conjoint analysis of wetland-based recreations: A case study of Louisiana waterfowl hunting. Unpublished Dissertation, Louisiana State University.

Gandais, A.F. (1994). An experimental study of the number of levels effect in metric conjoint analysis. Unpublished Dissertation, Concordia University Canada.

Gates, R. & Foytik, M. (1992). Linking conjoint analysis and perceptual mapping. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1992 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 181-188). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Gates, R., McDaniel, C. & Braunsberger, K. (2000). Modeling consumer health plan choice behavior to improve customer value and health plan market share. Journal of Business Research, 48, 247-257.

Gaul, W., Aust, E. & Baier, D. (1995). Gewinnorientierte Produktliniengestaltung unter Berücksichtigung des Kundennutzens. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 65 (8), 835-855.

Gaul, W., Lutz, U. & Aust, E. (1994). Goodwill towards domestic products as segmentation criterion: An empirical study within the scope of research on country-of-origin effects. In H.H. Bock, W. Lenski & M.M. Richter (eds.), Information systems and data analysis. Studies in classification and data analysis, and knowledge organization (Vol. 4, pp. 415-424). New York, NY: Springer.

Gedenk, K., Hensel-Börner, S. & Sattler, H. (1999). Bandbreitensensitivität von Verfahren zur Präferenzmessung. Arbeitspapier, Universität Jena.

Geiger, C.J., Wyse, B.W., Parent, C.R.M. & Hansen, R.G. (1991). Nutrition labels in bar graph format deemed most useful for consumer purchase decisions using adaptive conjoint analysis. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 7, 800-807.

Gensch, D.H. & Recker, W.W. (1979). The multinomial, multiattribute logit choice model. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 124-132.

Gerke, W. & Pfeufer-Kinnel, G. (1996). Preispolitik im Zahlungsverkehr. Marktforschung & Management, 40 (2), 59-64.

Gibson, L. (2001). What’s wrong with conjoint analysis. Marketing Research, 13 (4), 16-19.

Gibson, L. (2002). Conjoint analysis still misses the mark. Marketing Research, 14 (1), 49-50.

Gibson, L. (2002). What’s right with conjoint analysis. Marketing Research, 14 (1), 24-27.

Gierl, H. & Helm, R. (1999). Preisgarantien als Marketinginstrument des Handels. In O. Beisheim (Hrsg.), Distribution im Aufbruch: Bestandsaufnahme und Perspektiven (S. 823-842). München: Vahlen.

Gierl, H. & Lietzenmayer, H. (1997). Das Werbevolumen als glaubwürdiges Marktsignal. Planung und Analyse, 2, 64-66.

Gierl, H. & Stich, A. (1992). Marktsegmentierung für Kreditkarten. Die Bank, 7, 398-401.

Gierl, H. (1987). Von der Präferenz zum Kauf eines Markenartikels. Markenartikel, 10, 458-467.

Gill, J.M. & Sanchez, M. (1997). Consumer preferences for wine attributes: A conjoint approach. British Food Journal, 99 (1), 3-11.

Gillespie, J., Taylor, G., Schupp, A. & Wirth, F. (1998). Opinions of professional buyers toward a new, alternative red meat: Ostrich. Agribusiness, 14 (3), 247-256.

Goett, A., McFadden, D. & Woo, C.K. (1988). Estimating residential electricity outage cost with market research data. The Energy Journal, 9, 105-120.

Goglia, C. (2000, October). American Power Conversion online studies of product awareness and product choice: The American Power Conversion experience. Paper presented at the 2000 EXPLOR Awards Program in Chicago.

Golanty, J. (1995). Using discrete choice modeling to estimate market share. Adjust "perfect" test conditions with real-world assumptions. Marketing Research, 7 (4), 25-28.

Golanty, J. (1997). Conjoint analysis and choice modeling considerations. Marketing Research, Spring, 4-5.

Gold, L.N. (1995) New Technologies: Advancing Concept Research. Marketing Research, 7 (2), 42-43.

Goldberg, S.M., Green, P.E. & Wind, Y. (1984). Conjoint analysis of price premiums for hotel amenities. Journal of Business, 57 (1 pt.2), 111-132.

Gordon, M.E. & De Lima-Turner, K. (1997). Consumer attitudes toward internet advertising: A social contract perspective. International Marketing Review, 14 (5), 362-375.

Gosden, T., Bowler, I. & Sutton, M. (2000). How do general practitioners choose their practice? Preferences for practice and job characteristics. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 5 (4), 208-213.

Gould, S.J. (1992). Marketing exchange as a product of perceived value and control. In J.N. Sheth (Ed.), Research in Marketing (11, pp. 115-146). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc..

Gradwohl, R. (1998). Produktgestaltung mit Hilfe der adaptiven Conjoint-Analyse - am Beispiel eines Handscheinwerfers. Diplomarbeit, Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien.

Graf, M.A., Tanner, D.D. & Swinyard, W.R. (1993). Optimizing the delivery of patient and physician satisfaction: a conjoint analysis approach. Health Care Management Review, 18 (4), 34-43.

Green, E.P. & Tull, D.S. (1978). Chapter 14: Multidimensional scaling and conjoint analysis. In Research for marketing decisions (4th ed., pp. 477-495). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc..

Green, P.E. & Carmone, F.J. & Wind, Y. (1972). Subjective evaluation models and conjoint measurement. Behavioral Science, 17, 288-299.

Green, P.E. & Carmone, F.J. (1970). Multidimensional scaling and related techniques in marketing analysis. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Green, P.E. & DeSarbo, W.S. (1978). Additive decomposition of perceptions data via conjoint analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 58-65.

Green, P.E. & DeSarbo, W.S. (1979). Componential segmentation in the analysis of consumer trade-offs. Journal of Marketing, 43, 83-91.

Green, P.E. & Devita, M.T. (1974). A complementarity model of consumer utility for item collections. Journal of Consumer Research, 1 (12), 56-67.

Green, P.E. & Devita, M.T. (1975). An interaction model of consumer utility. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 146-153.

Green, P.E. & Frank, R.E. (1966). Bayesian statistics and marketing research. Applied Statistics, 15, 173-190.

Green, P.E. & Goldberg, S.M. (1982). A simple approach to the measurement of price-demand relationships in conjoint analysis. In R.K. Srivastava & A.D. Shocker (Eds.), Analytic Approaches to Product and Marketing Planning: The Second Conference (Report No. 82-109, pp. 135-141). Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

Green, P.E. & Goldberg, S.M. (1983). Hybrid conjoint models based on canonical correlation procedures. In W.R. Darden, K.B. Monroe & W.R. Dillon (Eds.), 1983 AMA Winter Educators’ Conference: Research Methods and Causal Modeling in Marketing. Proceedings Series (pp. 148-152). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.

Green, P.E. & Helsen, K. (1989). Cross-validation assessment of alternatives to individual level conjoint analysis: A case study. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 346-350.

Green, P.E. & Krieger, A.M. (1985a). Models and heuristics for product line selection. Marketing Science, 4 (1), 1-19.

Green, P.E. & Krieger, A.M. (1985b). Buyer similarity measures in conjoint analysis: Some alternative proposal. Journal of Classification, 2 (1), 41-61.

Green, P.E. & Krieger, A.M. (1988). Choice rules and sensitivity analysis in conjoint simulators. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 114-127.

Green, P.E. & Krieger, A.M. (1989). Recent contributions zu optimal product positioning and buyer segmentation. European Journal of Operational Research, 41, 127-141.

Green, P.E. & Krieger, A.M. (1990). Theory and methodology: A hybrid conjoint model for price-demand estimation. European Journal of Operational Research, 44, 28-38.

Green, P.E. & Krieger, A.M. (1991a). Segmenting markets with conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing, 55 (4), 20-31.

Green, P.E. & Krieger, A.M. (1991b). Modeling competitive pricing and market share: Anatomy of a decision support system (working paper, Report No. 91-106). Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

Green, P.E. & Krieger, A.M. (1992a). An application of a product positioning model to pharmaceutical products. Marketing Science, 11 (2), 117-132.

Green, P.E. & Krieger, A.M. (1992b). Theory and methodology: Modeling competitive pricing and market share: Anatomy of a decision support system. European Journal of Operational Research, 60, 31-44.

Green, P.E. & Krieger, A.M. (1994). A hybrid conjoint model with iterative response scale adjustment. Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science, 17, 273-279.

Green, P.E. & Krieger, A.M. (1995). Attribute importance weights modification in assessing a brand’s competitive potential. Marketing Science, 14 (3), 253-270.

Green, P.E. & Krieger, A.M. (1996). Individualized hybrid models for conjoint analysis. Management Science, 42 (6), 850-867.

Green, P.E. & Rao, V.R. (1971). Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 355-363.

Green, P.E. & Savitz, J. (1994). Applying conjoint analysis to product assortment and pricing in retailing research. Pricing Strategy and Practice, 2 (3), 4-19.

Green, P.E. & Schaffer, C.M. (1988). Importance weight sensitivity in the hybrid conjoint model. Working paper 88-006, The Warton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

Green, P.E. & Schaffer, C.M. (1991). Importance weight effects on self-explicated preference models: Some empirical findings. In R.H. Holman & M.R. Solomon (Eds.), In Advances in consumer research (No. 18, pp. 476-482). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

Green, P.E. & Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 103-123.

Green, P.E. & Srinivasan, V. (1987). A bibliography on conjoint analysis and related methodology in marketing research. Working paper, ???.

Green, P.E. & Srinivasan, V. (1990). Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. Journal of Marketing, 54 (Oct), 3-19.

Green, P.E. & Tull, D.S. (1982). Methoden und Techniken der Marketingforschung. Grundlage der Konjunkten Analyse (Conjoint Analysis, Verbundmessung) (S. 447-466). Stuttgart: Poeschel.

Green, P.E. & Wind, Y. (1973). Multivariate decisions in marketing: A measurement approach. Hinsdale: The Dryden Press.

Green, P.E. & Wind, Y. (1975). New way to measure consumers' judgments. Harvard Business Review, 53 (Jul/Aug), 107-117.

Green, P.E. (1963). Bayesian decision theory in pricing strategy. Journal of Marketing, 27 (1), 5-14.

Green, P.E. (1973). On the analysis of interactions in marketing research data. Journal of Marketing Research, 10, 410-420.

Green, P.E. (1974). On the design of choice experiments involving multifactor alternatives. Journal of Consumer Research, 1 (9), 61-68.

Green, P.E. (1975). On the robustness of multidimensional scaling techniques. Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 73-81.

Green, P.E. (1984). Hybrid models for conjoint analysis: An expository rewiew. Journal of Marketing Research, 21, 155-169.

Green, P.E. (1987). New books in review: CONJOINT ANALYZER. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 327-329.

Green, P.E. (1992). New books in review: CONSURV: Conjoint analysis software. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 387-390.

Green, P.E., Carmone, F.J. & Vankudre, P. (1984). Bootstrapped confidence intervals for conjoint-based choice simulators. In P.F. Anderson & M.J. Ryan (Eds.), 1984 AMA Winter Educators’ Conference: Scientific Method in Marketing (pp. 296-299). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.

Green, P.E., Carmone, F.J. & Wachspress, D.P. (1977). On the analysis of qualitative data in marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 52-59.

Green, P.E., Carmone, F.J. & Wind, Y. (1972). Subjective evaluation models and conjoint measurement. Behavioral Science, 17, 289-299.

Green, P.E., Carroll, J.D. & Carmone, F.J. (1977). Design considerations in attitude measurement. In Y. Wind & M.G. Greenberg (Eds.), Moving ahead with attitude research (pp. 9-18). American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL.

Green, P.E., Carroll, J.D. & Carmone, F.J. (1978). Some new types of fractional factorial designs for marketing experiments. In J.N. Sheth (Ed.), Research in marketing (1, 99-122). Greenwich: JAI.

Green, P.E., Carroll, J.D. & DeSarbo, W.S. (1981). Estimating choice probabilities in multiattribute decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 76-84.

Green, P.E., Carroll, J.D. & Goldberg, S.M. (1981). A general approach to product design optimization via conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing, 45 (3), 17-37.

Green, P.E., DeSarbo, W.S. (1978). Additive decomposition of perceptions data via conjoint analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 1, 56-67.

Green, P.E., Goldberg, S.M. & Montemayor, M. (1981). A hybrid utility estimation model for conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing, 45, 33-41.

Green, P.E., Goldberg, S.M. & Wiley, J.B. (1983). A cross validation test of hybrid conjoint models. In R.P. Bagozzi & A.M. Tybout (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (No. 10, pp. 147-150). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.

Green, P.E., Goldberg, S.M. (1981). A nonmetric version of the hybrid conjoint analysis model. In J.W. Keon (Ed.), Marketing: Measurement and analysis 1981, Proceedings of the Third ORSA/ TIMS special interest conference on market measurement and analysis (pp. 2-7).

Green, P.E., Helsen, K. & Shandler, B. (1988). Conjoint internal validity under alternative profile presentations. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 392-397.

Green, P.E., Kim, J. & Shandler, B. (1990). Predictive accuracy of classification and regression trees (CART) versus conjoint analysis. In B.J. Dunlap (Ed.), Developments in marketing science. Proceedings of the thirteenth annual conference of the Academy of Marketing Science (Vol. 13, pp. 366-370). Cullowhee, NC: Academy of Marketing Science.

Green, P.E., Krieger, A.M. & Agarwal, M.K. (1991a). Adaptive conjoint analysis: Some caveats and suggestions. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 215-222.

Green, P.E., Krieger, A.M. & Agarwal, M.K. (1992). Man versus model of man: When do conjoint models outpredict the decision maker? Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.

Green, P.E., Krieger, A.M. & Agarwal, M.K. (1993). A cross validation of four models for quantifying multiattribute preferences. Marketing Letters, 4 (4), 369-380.

Green, P.E., Krieger, A.M. & Bansal, P. (1988). Completely unacceptable levels in conjoint analysis: A cautionary note. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 293-300.

Green, P.E., Krieger, A.M. & Carroll, D.J. (1987). Conjoint analysis and multidimensional scaling: A complementary approach. Journal of Advertising Research, 27 (5), 21-27.

Green, P.E., Krieger, A.M. & Schaffer, C.M. (1993a). An empirical test of optimal respondent weighting in conjoint analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21, 345-351.

Green, P.E., Krieger, A.M. & Schaffer, C.M. (1993b). A hybrid conjoint model with individual-level interaction estimation. In L. McAlister & M.L. Rothschild (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (No. 20, pp. 149-154). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

Green, P.E., Krieger, A.M. & Vavra, T.G. (1997). Evaluating new products. Marketing Research, 9 (4), 12-21.

Green, P.E., Krieger, A.M. & Wind, Y. (2001). Thirty years of conjoint analysis: Reflections and prospects. Interfaces, 31 (3, part 2), S56-S73.

Green, P.E., Krieger, A.M. & Zelnio, R.N. (1989). A componential segmentation model with optimal design features. Decision Sciences, 20, 221-238.

Green, P.E., Rao, V.R. & DeSarbo, W.S. (1978). Incorporating group-level similarity judgments in conjoint analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 187-193.

Green, P.E., Schaffer, C.M. & Patterson, K.M. (1991b). A validation study of Sawtooth Software's adaptive conjoint analysis. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1991 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 303-314). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Green, P.E., Tull, D.S. & Albaum, G. (1988). Chapter 15: Multidimensional scaling and conjoint analysis. In Research for marketing decisions (5^th ed., pp. 599-633). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Green, P.E., Wind, Y. & Jain, A.K. (1972). Preference measurement of item collections. Journal of Marketing Research, 9, 371-377.

Greenberg, M.G. (1992). Comment on Moore, telephone conjoint: It’s fast, it’s cheap and you get what you pay for. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1992 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 253-255). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Greene, C.S. & Nkonge, J. (1989). Gaining a competitive edge through conjoint analysis. Business, 14-18.

Greenhalgh, L. & Neslin, S.A. (1981). Conjoint analysis of negotiator preferences. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 25, 301-327.

Greenhalgh, L., Neslin, S.A. & Gilkey, R.W. (1985). The effects of negotiator preferences, situational power, and negotiator personality on outcomes of business negotiations. Academy of Management Journal, 28 (1), 9-33.

Greenley, G. & Bayus, B. (1993). Marketing planning decision making in U.K. and U.S. companies: An empirical comparative study. Journal of Marketing Management, 9, 155-172.

Griner, B.P. & Farber, S.C. (1996). A conjoint analysis of water quality enhancements and degradations in a western Pennsylvania watershed. Watershed '96 Conference Paper, Water Environment Federation, Baltimore MD.

Griner, B.P. & Farber, S.C. (1996). Valuing watershed quality enhancements using conjoint analysis. Paper presented at the Fourth Biennial Meeting of the International Society of Ecological Economics. Boston, MA.

Großmann, H. & Jütting, A. (1999). Evaluation adaptiver Software. Ein Fallbeispiel. In H. Holling & G. Gediga (Hrsg.), Evaluationsforschung (S. 235-247). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

Guadagni, P.M. & Little, J.D. (1983). A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Science, 2 (3), 203-238.

Gum, G.S. (1989). Using Ci2 and ACA to obtain complex pricing information. In Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference: Gaining a Competitive Advantage Through PC-Based Interviewing and Analysis (Vol. 1, pp. 65-69). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Gupta, A.K., Brockhoff, K. & Weisenfeld, U. (1992). Making trade-offs in the new product development process: A German/U.S. comparison. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9, 11-18.

Gustafsson, A. & Granbom, H. (1993). The use of conjoint analysis to develop customer oriented products - a case study. Paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED ´93), The Hague.

Gustafsson, A. & Sandvik-Wiklund, P. (forthcoming). Conjoint analysis in a TQM context - a case study on customer involvement in product design. Quality Engineering.

Gustafsson, A. (1996). Customer focused product development by conjoint analysis and QFD. Linköping Studies in Science and Technology, Dissertation No. 418, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Gustafsson, A., Ekdahl, F. & Bergman, B. (1999). Conjoint analysis: A useful tool in the design process. Total Quality Management, 10 (3), 327-343.

Gustafsson, A., Herrmann, A. & Huber, F. (2000). Conjoint analysis as an instrument of market research practice. In A. Gustafsson, A. Herrmann & F. Huber (Eds.), Conjoint measurement - methods and applications (pp. 5-45). Berlin: Springer.

Gustafsson, A., Herrmann, A. & Huber, F. (2000). Conjoint measurement: Methods and applications. Berlin: Springer.

Gutsche, J. (1995). Produktpräferenzanalyse: Ein modelltheoretisches und methodisches Konzept zur Marktsimulation mittels Präferenzerfassungsmodellen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

Gyrd-Hansen, D. (2000). Cost-benefit analysis of mammography screening Denmark based on discrete ranking data. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 16 (3), 811-821.