F

Fama, E.F. & French, K.R. (2002). Testing trade-off and pecking order predictions about dividends and dept. Review of Financial Studies, 15 (1), 1-33.

Farber, S. & Griner, B. (2000). Using conjoint analysis to value ecosystem change. Environmental Science & Technology, 34 (8), 1407-1412.

Farrar, S., Ryan, M. (1999). Response-ordering effects: A methodological issue in conjoint analysis. Health Economics, 8 (1), 75-79.

Farrar, S., Ryan, M., Ross, D. & Ludbrook, A. (1997). Prioritisation of clinical service developments in a teaching hospital: An application of conjoint analysis (Discussion Papers No. 8). Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen, Health Economics Research Unit.

Faul, F. (1993). Numerisches Conjoint Measurement. Eine Programmdokumentation (Berichte aus dem Psychologischen Institut der Universität Bonn Bd. 19, 5). Bonn: Universität, Psychologisches Institut.

Fenwick, I. (1975). A user´s guide to conjoint measurement in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 12 (2), 203-211.

Fenwick, I., Heeler, R. & Simmie, P. (1983). Switching commuters from car to public transit: A micro modelling approach. Journal of Economic Psychology, 3 (3-4), 333-345.

Feurstein, M., Natter, M. & Kehl, L. (1999). Forecasting scanner data by choice-based conjoint models. In Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference (No. 7, pp. 169-182). Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software.

Fidler, E.J. & Thompson, G.L. (1977). An experiment on executive decision making (Management Science Report No 407). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie-Mellon University, Graduate School of Industrial Administration.

Fiedler, J.A. (1972). Condominium pricing and design: A case study in consumer trade-off analysis. Proceedings conference of the Association for Consumer Research (pp. 279-293).

Fiedler, J.A. (1988). Conjoint predictions: 15 years later. In R.M. Johnson (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference of Perceptual Mapping, Conjoint Analysis, and Computer Interviewing (No. 2, pp. 25-35). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Filiatrault, P. & Ritchie, J.R.B. (1988). The impact of situational factors on the evaluation of hospitality services. Journal of Travel Research, 29-37.

Fillip, S. (1997). Marktorientierte Konzeption der Produktqualität. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Univ.-Verlag.

Finkbeiner, C. (1992). Comment on Steinberg. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1992 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 425-429). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Finkbeiner, C.T. & Lim, P.C. (1991). Including interactions in conjoint models. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1991 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 271-298). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Finkbeiner, C.T. & Platz, P.J. (1986). Computerized versus paper and pencil methods: A comparison study. Paper presented at the Association for Consumer Research Conference. Toronto (October).

Finkbeiner, C.T. (1988). Comparison of conjoint choice simulators. In R.M. Johnson (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference of Perceptual Mapping, Conjoint Analysis, and Computer Interviewing (No. 2, pp. 75-103). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Finkbeiner, C.T. (1991). Comment on Tumbusch. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1991 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 185-187). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Finkbeiner, C.T. (1992). Alternative applications of preference models to customer satisfaction research. In Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference (pp. 127-159). Sun Valley, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Finkbeiner, C.T. (1997). Integrated choice likelihood (ICL) model. In Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference (No. 6, pp. 291-329). Seattle, WA: Sawtooth Software.

Finkelstein, B.S., Singh, J., Silvers, J.B., Marrero, U., Neuhauser, D. & Cuttler, L. (1999). Patient attitudes and preferences regarding treatment: GH therapy for childhood short stature. Hormone Research, 51 (S1), 67-72.

Finn, A. & Louviere, J. (1990). Shopping-center patronage models: Fashioning a consideration set segmentation solution. Journal of Business Research, 21, 259-275.

Finn, A. & Louviere, J.J. (1995). Obtaining citizens‘ input for a new Canadian institution: An application of tradeoff analysis (Information Bulletin No. 29). Edmonton, Alta.: Western Centre for Economic Research, University of Alberta.

Firner, H. & Tacke, G. (1993). BahnCard: Kreative Preisstruktur. Absatzwirtschaft, 5, 66-70.

Fischer, J. (2001). Individualisierte Präferenzanalyse. Entwicklung und empirische Prüfung einer vollkommen individualisierten Conjoint-Analyse. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

Fischer, J. & Henrichsmeier, S. (1998). Neue Produkte erfolgreich gestalten. Conjoint Analyse zur marktorientierten Gestaltung von Produkt- und Servicekonzepten (RWTH Themen Nr. 1/98, S. 29-30). Aachen: RWTH.

Fischer, J. & Schmidt, R. (1998). Die Fuzzy-Präferenzmessung: Ausgangspunkt einer unscharfen Conjoint-Analyse. Arbeitspapier (Nr. 98/11), Institut für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, RWTH Aachen.

Fishbein, M. (1967). A behavior theory approach to the relations between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward the object. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement (pp. 389-400). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Fishburn, P.C. (1967). Methods of estimating additive utilities. Management Science, 13, 435-453.

Fishburn, P.C. (1991). Nontransitive additive conjoint measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 35 (1), 1-40.

Fisher, W.P. (1994). Applications of probabilistic conjoint measurement. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Ford, D.L., Moskowitz, H. & Wittink, D.R. (1975). Econometric modeling of individual and group multiattribute utility functions (Research Paper No. 491). West Lafayette, IN: Institute for Research in the Behavioral, Economic, and Management Sciences, Krannert Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Purdue University.

Formisano, R.A., Olshavsky, R.W. & Tapp, S. (1982). Choice strategy in a difficult task environment. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 474-479.

Fox, J. (1984). Chapter 5: Logit and log-linear models for qualitative data. In Linear statistical models and related methods: With applications to social research (pp. 302-313). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Foytik, M. (1999). Conjoint on the web - lessons learned. In Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference (No. 7, pp. 9-22). Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software.

Fraas, J.W. & Paugh, R. (1989, October). Student perceptions of the relative importance of selected attributes of an institution of higher education: A conjoint approach. Paper presented at the 11th Annual Meeting of Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

Franke, N. (1999). Conjoint-Analyse von Personalselektionen. WISU, 8-9, 1074-1077.

Franke, N. (1999). High-Potentials - Conjointanalytische Identifikation und empirisches Realbild zukünftiger kaufmännischer Führungseliten. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 69 (8), 889-911.

Frazier, C. & Patterson, M. (2000). Cutoff-constrained discrete choice models. In Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference (No. 8, pp. 71-75). Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software.

Frewer, L.J., Howard, C., Hedderley, D. & Shepherd, R. (1997). Consumer attitudes towards different food processing technologies used in cheese production: The influence of consumer benefit. Food Quality and Preference, 8 (4), 271-280.

Fröhling, O. (1994). Verbesserungsmöglichkeiten und Entwicklungsperspektiven von Conjoint+Cost. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 64 (9), 1143-1164.

Frühwirth-Schnatter, S. & Otter, T. (1999). Conjoint analysis using mixed effect models. In H. Friedl, A. Berghold & G. Kauermann (eds.), Statistical modelling. Proceedings of the 14^th International Workshop on Statistical Modelling (pp. 181-191). Graz.