D
Dagsvik,
J.K. (1994). Discrete and continuous choice, max-stable processes,
and independece from irrelevant attributes. Econometrica,
62 (5), 1179-1205.
Dahan, E. & Srinivasan, V.
(1998). The predictive power of internet-based product concept
testing using visual depiction and animation. Working
paper, Stanford University, CA.
Danaher,
P.J. (1997). Using conjoint analysis to determine the relative
importance of service attributes measured in customer satisfaction surveys. Journal
of Retailing, 73 (2), 235-260.
Darmon, R.Y. & Coderre, F.
(1993). The predictive validity of conjoint analysis. The case
of concepts with interpolated attribute levels (CERESSEC
working paper, DR 93036). Cergy Pontoise: CERESSEC.
Darmon, R.Y. & Rouzies, D.
(1989). Assessing conjoint analysis internal validity: The
effect of various continuous attribute level spacings. International Journal
of Research in Marketing, 6, 35-44.
Darmon, R.Y. & Rouzies, D. (1991).
Internal validity assessment of conjoint estimated attribute importance
weights. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19 (4), 315-322.
Darmon, R.Y. & Rouzies, D.
(1994). Reliability and internal validity of conjoint estimated utility functions
under error-free versus error-full conditions. International Journal of
Research in Marketing, 11 (5), 465-477.
Darmon, R.Y. & Rouzies, D.
(1999). Internal validity of conjoint analysis under alternative measurement
procedures. Journal of Business Research, 46 (1), 67-81.
DATALOGICS (1991). FUTREX:
Conjoint/trade-off program. Software. DATALOGICS Marketing Service
Division, PA.
Datoo, B.A. (1994). Measuring
price elasticity: Researchers today have a choice of methodologies. Here’s how
to make the right trade-off. Marketing Research, 6 (2), 30-34.
Davidson, J.D. (1973). Forecasting
traffic on STOL. Operations Research Quarterly, 24, 561-569.
Dawes, R.M. & Corrigan, B.
(1974). Linear models in decision-making. Psychological
Bulletin, 81, 95-106.
Dawes, R.M. (1982). The
robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. In D. Kahneman, P.
Slovic & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgement under uncertainty. Heuristics and
biases (pp. 391-407). New York.
de Ruyter, K. & Wetzels, M.
(1996). Two sides of the same story: Measuring different quality perceptions of
the dyadic service encounter with the SERVCON instrument. Total Quality Management, 7 (6), 595-603.
Deal, K. (2001). Individual level
discrete-choice conjoint using CBC/HB. Marketing Research, 13 (1), 31-33.
Dehn, K. (2000). Quantifizierung der Bedeutung der
Produktmerkmale Preis und Marke mittels Conjoint Measurement. Werbeforschung
& Praxis, 2, 40-43.
Dellaert,
B.G.C., Arentze, T.A., Bierlaire, M., Borgers A.W.J. & Timmermans, H.J.P.
(1998). Investigating consumers´ tendency to combine
multiple shopping purposes and destinations. Journal of Marketing Research,
35 (2), 177-188.
Dellaert, B.G.C., Borgers, A.W.J.,
Louviere, J.J. & Timmermans, H.J.P. (1998). Consumer choice of
modularized products: A conjoint choice experiment approach. Working paper,
Center for Economic Research, Tilburg University, Netherlands.
Dellaert, B.G.C., Borgers, A.W.J.
& Timmermans, H.J.P. (1995). A day in the city. Using conjoint choice
experiments to model tourists choice of activity packages. Tourism
Management, 16, 347-353.
Dellaert, B.G.C., Borgers, A.W.J.
& Timmermans, H.J.P. (1996). Conjoint choice models of joint participation
and activity choice. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13,
251-264.
Dellaert, B.G.C., Borgers, A.W.J.
& Timmermans, H.J.P. (1997). Conjoint choice models of tourist portfolio choice:
Theory and Illustration. Leisure Sciences, 19, 31-58.
Dellaert, B.G.C., Prodigalidad, M.
& Louviere, J.J. (1998a). Using conjoint analysis to study family travel
preference structures: A comparison of day trips and 1-week holidays. Tourism
Analysis, 2 (2), 67-76.
Dellaert, B.G.C., Prodigalidad, M.
& Louviere, J.J. (1998b). Family members´ projections of each
other´s preference and influence: A two-stage conjoint approach. Marketing
Letters, 9 (2), 135-146.
Delquié, P. (1993). Inconsistent
trade-offs between attributes: New evidence in preference assessment biases. Management
Science, 39 (11), 1382-1395.
DeMaris, A. (1992). Logit
modeling: Practical applications. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE
Publications.
Denison, D.R. & Fornell, C.
(1990). Modeling distance structures in consumer research: Scale versus order
in validity assessment. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 479-489.
Dennis,
D.F. (1998). Analyzing public inputs to multiple objective decisions
on national forests using conjoint analysis. Forest Science, 44 (3),
421-429.
Dennis, D.F. (2000). An ordered
probit analysis of public values for use in multiple objective decision-making.
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 27, 127-137.
DeSarbo, W. & Cron, W. (1988). A
maximum likelihood methodology for clusterwise linear regression. Psychometrica, 54 (4), 707-736.
DeSarbo,
W.S. & Green, P.E. (1984). Concept, theory, and techniques:
Choice-constrained conjoint analysis. Decision Sciences, 15, 297-323.
DeSarbo, W.S. & Kholi, J.
(1994, August). Consideration sets in conjoint analysis. Paper presented
at Statistics in Marketing Section, The Joint Statistical Meetings in Toronto.
DeSarbo, W.S., Carroll, J.D.,
Lehmann, D.R. & O´Shaughnessy, J. (1982). Three-way multivariate conjoint
analysis. Marketing Science, 1 (Fall), 323-350.
DeSarbo, W.S., Huff, L.,
Rolandelli, M.M. & Choi, J. (1994). Chapter 9: On the measurement of
perceived service quality: A conjoint analysis approach. In R.T. Rust & R.L.
Oliver (Eds.), Service quality: new directions in theory and practice
(pp. 201-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
DeSarbo, W.S., Oliver, R.S. &
Rangaswamy, A. (1989). A simulated annealing methodology for clusterwise linear
regression. Psychometrika, 54 (4), 707-736.
DeSarbo, W.S., Ramaswamy, V. &
Cohen, S.H. (1995). Market segmentation with choice-based conjoint analysis. Marketing
Letters, 6 (2), 137-147.
DeSarbo, W.S., Wedel, M., Vriens,
M. & Ramaswamy, V. (1992). Latent class metric conjoint analysis. Marketing
Letters, 3 (3), 273-289.
DeSoete, G. (1981). Ein Thurstonischer Ansatz zur
probabilistischen verbundenen Messung. Archiv für Psychologie, 134 (1),
59-72.
Diamantopoulos,
A., Schlegelmilch, B.B. & Du Preez, J.P. (1995). Lessons for
pan-european marketing? The role of consumer preferences in fine-tuning the
product-market fit. International Marketing Review, 12 (2), 38-52.
Diamond, J.J., Ruth, H.R.,
Markham, F.W., Rabinowitz, H.K. & Rosenthal, M.P. (1994). Speciality
selections of Jefferson Medical College students: A conjoint analysis. Evaluation
& the Health Professions, 17 (3), 322-328.
Dichtl,
E & Thomas, U. (1986). Der Einsatz des Conjoint Measurement im Rahmen der
Verpackungsmarktforschung. Marketing ZFP, 8
(1), 35-40.
Diederich, A. & Orth, B.
(1988). Axiome und
ihre empirische Überprüfung. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte
Psychologie, 35 (4), 546-558.
Diekmann,
A. (1982). Eine additiv verbundene Messung des Sozialprestiges. Zeitschrift
für Sozialpsychologie, 13 (1), 22-31.
Dijkstra, J. & Timmermans,
H.J.P. (1997). Exploring the possibilities of conjoint measurement as a
decision-making tool for virtual way finding environments. In Yu-Tung Liu
(Ed.), CAADRIA '97. Proceedings of The Second Conference on Computer Aided
Architetural Design Research in Asia (pp.61-72). Taipeh: Hu's Publishers.
Diller,
H. (1991). Preispolitik (2. überarbeitete Aufl.). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Diller,
H., George, G. & Hammer, K. (1992). Die Preisfindung bei industriellen
Gütern am Beispiel Telefonanlagen - Ergebnisse einer Conjoint Measurement
Studie. Arbeitspapier (Nr. 13), Lehrstuhl für Marketing, Universität
Nürnberg-Erlangen.
Ding,
S., Geschke, U. & Lewis, R. (1991). Conjoint
analysis and ist application in the hospitality industry. Journal of the
International Academy of Hospitality Research, 2, 2-29.
Dobson,
G. & Kalish, S. (1993). Heuristics for pricing and
positioning a product-line using conjoint and cost data. Management
Science, 39 (2), 160-175.
Dolan, P. (1999). Valuing
health-related quality of life: Issues and controversies. Pharmacoeconomics,
15 (2), 119-127.
Dorsch, M.J. & Teas, R.K.
(1992). A test of the convergent validity of self-explicated and
decompositional conjoint measurement. Journal of the Academy of Marketing
Science, 20, 37-48.
Dréze,
X. & Zufryden, F. (1997). Testing web site design and
promotional content. Journal of Advertising Research, 37 (2), 77-91.
Dréze,
X. & Zufryden, F. (1998). A web-based methodology for
product design evaluation and optimisation. Journal of the Operational
Research Society, 49, 1034-1043.
Driver, R.W., Hatfield, J.D. &
Huseman, R.C. (1981). A proposed method for analyzing employee benefit
preferences: Conjoint measurement. Human Resource Management, 20 (1),
18-23.
Dubè,
L., Renaghan, L.M. & Miller, J.M. (1994). Measuring
customer satisfaction for strategic management. The Cornell Hotel &
Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 39-47.
Durvasula, S., Sharma, S. &
Andrews, J.C. (1992). STOLRELOC: A retail store location model based on
managerial judgments. Journal of Retailing, 68 (4), 420-444.
Dykstra, O. Jr. (1958).
Factorial experimentation in Scheffé's analysis of variance for paired
comparison. American Statistical Association Journal, 53, 529-542.