C

Cairns, J. & van der Pol, M. (2001). Discrete choice with repeated follow-up: A web-based experiment. Skriftserie i helseøkonomi (No. 30), Program for helseøkonomi i Bergen.

Cakelja, J. (1999). Einsatz der Conjoint-Analyse zur Bewertung von Logistiksystemen. Diplomarbeit, Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien.

Carmichael, B. (1992). Chapter 6: Using conjoint modeling to measure tourist image and analyze ski resort choice. In P. Johnson & B. Thomas (Eds.), Choice and demand in tourism (pp. 93-106).

Carmichael, B. (1996). Conjoint analysis of downhill skiers used to improve data collection for market segmentation. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 5 (3), 187-206.

Carmone, F. (1987). New books in review: ACA system for adaptive conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 325-327.

Carmone, F.J. & Green, P.E. (1981). Model misspecification in multiattribute parameter estimation. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 87-93.

Carmone, F.J. & Shaffer, C.M. (1995). Software Review: Conjoint Designer, Conjoint Analyzer, SIMGRAF, Conjoint Linmap, Conjoint Segmenter, Bridger, CONSURV, ACA, CBC, CVA. Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (1), 113-120.

Carmone, F.J. (1986). New books in review: CONJOINT DESIGNER. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 311-312.

Carmone, F.J., Green, P.E. & Jain, A.K. (1978). Robustness of conjoint analysis: Some monté carlo results. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 300-303.

Carpenter, G.S., Glazer, R. & Nakamoto, K. (1994). Meaningful brands from meaningless differentiation: The dependence on irrelevant attributes. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 339-350.

Carroll, J.D. & Green, P.E. (1995). Psychometric methods in marketing research: Part I, Conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 23 (November), 385-391.

Carroll, J.D. (1969). Categorial conjoint measurement. Paper presented at the Meeting of Mathematical Psychology, Ann Arbor.

Carroll, J.D. (1969). Categorical conjoint measurement. Unpublished Manuscript, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJOURNAL.

Carroll, J.D. (1973). Models and algorithms for multidimensional scaling, conjoint measurement, and related techniques. In P.E. Green & Y. Wind (Eds.), Multivariate decisions in marketing: A measurement approach (pp. 199-273). Hinsdale: The Dryden Press.

Carroll, N.V. & Gagnon, J.P. (1984). Consumer demand for patient-oriented pharmacy services. American Journal of Public Health, 74 (6), 609-611.

Carter, R. & Dubelaar, C. & Wiley, J.B. (2000). Applying choice based conjoint measurement to forecast demand for a new restaurant category. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 6 (3), 63-78.

Cattin, P. & Bliemel, F. (1978). Metric vs. nonmetric procedures for multiattribute modeling: Some simulation results. Decision Sciences, 9, 474-480.

Cattin, P. & Weinberger, M. (1980). Some validity and reliability issues in the measurement of attribute utilities. In J. Olson (Ed.), Advances in consumer research: Proceedings of the Association for Consumer Research Tenth Annual Conference (No. 7, pp. 780-783). San Francisco, CA: Association for Consumer Research.

Cattin, P. & Wittink, D.R. (1981). Commercial use of conjoint analysis: A survey. In J.W. Keon (Ed.), Marketing: Measurement and analysis 1981, Proceedings of the Third ORSA/ TIMS special interest conference on market measurement and analysis (pp. 21-31).

Cattin, P. & Wittink, D.R. (1982). Commercial use of conjoint analysis: A survey. Journal of Marketing, 46 (Summer), 44-53.

Cattin, P., Gelfand, A.E. & Danes, J. (1983). A simple bayesian procedure for estimation in a conjoint model. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 29-35.

Cattin, P., Hermet, G. & Pioche, A. (1982). Alternative hybrid models for conjoint analysis: Some empirical results. In R.K. Srivastava & A.D. Shocker (Eds.), Analytic Approaches to Product and Marketing Planning: The Second Conference (No. 82-109, pp. 142-151). Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

Cerro, D. (1988). Conjoint analysis by mail. In R.M. Johnson (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference on Perceptual Mapping, Conjoint Analysis, and Computer Interviewing (No. 2, pp. 139-144). Ketchum, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Cestre, G. & Darmon, R.Y. (1998). Assessing consumer preferences in the context of new product diffusion. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15, 123-135.

Chakraborty, G., Ball, D., Gaeth, G.J. & Sunkyu, J. (2002). The ability of ratings and choice conjoint to predict market shares. A Monte Carlo simulation. Journal of Business Research, 55 (3), 237-249.

Chakraborty, G., Ettenson, R. & Gaeth, G. (1994). How consumers choose health insurance. Analyzing employees´ selection process in a multiplan environment identifies the trade-offs consumers make and the benefits that affect their decision making. Journal of Health Care Marketing, 14 (1), 21-33.

Chakraborty, G., Gaeth, G. & Cunningham, M. (1993). Understanding consumers preferences for dental service. Journal of Health Care Marketing, 13 (3), 48-58.

Chakraborty, G., Woodworth, G.G., Gaeth, G.J. & Ettenson, R. (1992). Screening for interactions between design factors and demographics in choice-based conjoint. Journal of Business Research, 24 (2), 115-133.

Chakraborty, G., Woodworth, G.G., Gaeth, G.J. & Ettenson, R. (1991). Screening for interactions between design factors and demographics in choice-based conjoint. Journal of Business Research, 23 (3), 219-237.

Chan, L.K., Kao, H.P., Ng, A. & Wu, M.L. (1999). Rating the importance of customer needs in quality function deployment by fuzzy and entropy methods. International Journal of Production Research, 37 (11), 2499-2518.

Chapman, R.G. & Bolton, R.N. (1985). Attribute presentation order bias and nonstationarity in full profile conjoint analysis tasks. In R.F. Lusch, G.T. Ford, G.L. Frazier, R.D. Howell, C.A. Ingene, M. Reilly & R.W. Stampfl (Eds.), 1985 AMA Educators’ Proceedings (No. 51, pp. 373-379). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.

Chapman, R.G. & Staelin, R. (1982). Exploiting rank ordered choice set data within the stochastic utility model. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 288-301.

Chapman, R.G. (1984). An approach to estimating logit models of a single decision maker's choice behavior. In Advances in consumer research (No. 11, pp. 656-661). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

Chapman, R.G. (1993). BRANDSä : A marketing game. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.

Chen, K.D. & Hausman, W.H. (2000). Technical note: Mathematical properties of the optimal product line selection problem using choice-based conjoint analysis. Management Science, 46 (2), 327-332.

Chinburapa, V., Larson, L.N., Brucks, M., Draugalis, J., et al. (1993). Physician prescribing decisions: The effects of situational involvement and task complexity on information acquisition and decision making. Social Science and Medicine, 36 (11), 1473-1482.

Choi, S.C. & DeSarbo, W.S. (1993). Game theory derivations of competitive strategies in conjoint analysis. Marketing Letters, 4 (4), 337-348.

Chrzan, K. & Boeger, L. (1999, May). Improving choice predictions with the cutoff-constrained aggregate choice model. Paper presented at the Marketing Science Conference on Reflection and Renewal, Syracuse, University School of Management.

Chrzan, K. & Fellermann, R. (1997). A comparison of full- and partial-profile best/worst conjoint analsis. In Sawtooth Software (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference, August 1997 (No. 6, pp. 59-67). Seattle, Washington: Sawtooth Software.

Chrzan, K. & Grisaffe, D.B. (1992). A comparison of telephone conjoint analysis with full profile conjoint analyses and adaptive conjoint analysis. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1992 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 225-242). Sun Valley, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Chrzan, K. & Orme, B. (2000). An overview and comparison of design strategies for choice-based conjoint analysis. In Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference (No. 8, pp. 161-177). Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software.

Chrzan, K. & Skrapits, M. (1996). Best/worst conjoint analysis: An empirical comparison with a full profile choice-based conjoint experiment. Paper presented at the INFORMS Marketing Science Conference, Gainsville, FL.

Chrzan, K. & Skrapits, M. (1997). Testing for IIA violations in partial profile conjoint models. Paper presented at the 1997 INFORMS Marketing Science Conference, Berkeley, CA.

Chrzan, K. (1990, August). A survey version of full-profile conjoint analysis. Paper presented at the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.

Chrzan, K. (1991a). Unreliable respondents in conjoint analysis: Their impact and identification. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1991 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 205-228). Sun Valley, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Chrzan, K. (1991b). Comment on Kopel and Kever. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1991 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 155-156). Sun Valley, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Chrzan, K. (1992). Comment on Huber, Wittink, Miller, and Johnson. In M. Metegrano (Ed.), 1992 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 283-284). Sun Valley, ID: Sawtooth Software.

Chrzan, K. (1994). Three kinds of order effects in choice-based conjoint analysis. Marketing Letters, 5 (2), 165-172.

Chrzan, K. (1998). Design efficiency of partial profile choice experiments. Paper presented at the 1998 INFORMS Marketing Science Conference, Paris.

Chrzan, K. (1999). Full versus partial profile choice experiments: Aggregate and disaggregate comparisons. In Proceedings of the Sawtooth Software Conference (No. 7, pp. 235-248). Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software.

Chrzan, K. (2000, May). Testing a psychological explanation of the number of levels problem in choice-based conjoint analysis. Paper presented at the 2000 Advanced Research Techniques Forum in Monterey, CA.

Chrzan, K., Bunch, D.S. & Lockhart, D.C. (1996). Testing a multinomial extension to partial profile choice experiments: Empirical comparisons to full profile experiments. Paper presented at the INFORMS Marketing Science Conference, Gainsville, FL.

Churchill, G.A. (1995). Appendix 9B: Conjoint measurement. In Marketing research: Methodological foundations (6th ed., pp. 505-523). Orlando, FL: The Dryden Press.

Churchill, G.A. Jr. (1987). Appendix 8B: Conjoint measurement in chapter 8: Attitude measurement. In Marketing research: Methodological foundations (4th ed., pp. 364-377). New York, NY: The Dryden Press.

Churchill, G.A. Jr. (1988). Conjoint measurement in part 4: Data-collection forms. In Basic marketing research (pp. 358-361). Chicago, IL: The Dryden Press.

Churchill, G.A. Jr. (1991). Appendix 9B: Conjoint measurement in chapter 8: Attitude measurement. In Marketing research: Methodological foundations (5th ed., pp. 464-482). Chicago, IL: The Dryden Press.

Clarke, D.G. (1987). Marketing analysis and decision making. Redwood City, CA: The Scientific Press.

Claxton, J.D. (1994). Conjoint analysis in travel research: A manager’s guide. In Ritchie & Goeldner (Eds.), Travel tourism, hospitality research: Handbook for managers and researchers (2nd ed., pp. 513-522).

Cohen, S.H. (1997). Perfect union: CBCA marries the best of conjoint and discrete choice models. Marketing Research, 9 (1), 12-17.

Cohen, S.L., Dove, D.W. & Bachelder, E.L. (2001). Time to Treat Learners as Consumers. Training & Development, 55 (1), 54-57.

Colberg, R.T. (1977). Validation of conjoint measurement methods: A simulation and empirical investigation. Unpublished dissertation, University of Washington.

Colberg, R.T. (1978). A Monte Carlo evaluation of metric recovery of conjoint measurement algorithms. In S.C. Jain (Ed.), Research frontiers in marketing: Dialogues and directions (No. 43, pp. 22-26). Chicago: American Marketing Association.

Collins-Dodd, C. & Huber, J. (1998). Using uncorrelated conjoint designs in a world of correlated beliefs. Developments in Marketing Science, 21, 486-487.

Conrad, T. (1997). Preisbildung mittels Conjoint-Analyse und eines Simulationsmodells am Beispiel eines Premiumanbieters der Automobilindustrie. Dissertation, Universität Tübingen.

Coombs, C.H. & Lehner, P.E. (1980). The conjoint analysis of the bilinear model, illustrated with a theory of risk. In I. Borg (Ed.), Multidimensional data representations: When & why (pp. 565-589). Ann Arbor, MI: Mathesis Press.

Cooper, L.G. (1989). A review of multidimensional scaling in marketing research. In P.E. Green, F.J. Carmone & S.M. Smith (Eds.), Part III: Literature review of multidimensional scaling: Concepts and applications (pp. 140-168). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Corstjens, M.L. & Gautschi, D.A. (1983). Conjoint analysis: A comparative analysis of specification tests for the utility function. Management Science, 29 (12), 1393-1413.

Cosper, R. & Kinsley, B.L. (1984). An application of conjoint analysis to leisure research: Cultural preferences in Canada. Journal of Leisure Research, 16 (3), 224-233.

Cramer, J.S. (1991). The logit model for economicists. New York, NY: Edward Arnold.

Crane, M. (1991). Conjoint analysis: A guide for designing & interpreting conjoint studies. Austin, Texas: IntelliQuest, Inc.

Crawford, G.A. (1994). A conjoint analysis of reference services in academic libraries. College & Research Libraries, 55 (3), 257-267.

Creyer, E. & Ross, W.T. (1988). The effects of range-frequency manipulations on conjoint importance weight stability. In Advances in consumer research (No. 15, pp. 505-509). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

Crown, E.M. & Brown, S.A. (1984). Consumer trade-offs among flame retardance and other product attributes: A conjoint analysis of consumer preferences. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 18 (2), 305-316.

Currim, I. (1982). Predictive testing of consumer choice models not subject to independence of irrelevant alternatives. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 208-222.

Currim, I.S., Weinberg, C.B. & Wittink, D.R. (1981). The design of subscription programs for a performing arts series. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 67-75.

Curry, D. & Rodgers, W. (1977). Aggregating responses in additive conjoint measurement. In W.D. Perreault (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 5, pp. 35-40). Provo, UT: American Marketing Association.

Curry, J. (1992). Technology - a blueprint for success. Marketing opportunities with advanced research techniques. In Proceedings of the second SKIM Seminar (pp. 109-116). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: SKIM Market and Policy Research.

Curry, J. (1997). After the basics: Keeping key issues in mind makes conjoint analysis easier to apply. Marketing Research, 9 (1), 6-11.